Simms: I knew about Manning's 2nd surgery

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

goalmouth

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2003
Messages
17,431
City & State/Province
N.A.
Phil Simms told Mike & Mike this morning that he knew about Peyton Manning's second surgery but decided not to say anything publicly "because breaking news isn't my thing."

Sheesh.
 
Nantz probably knew too, but removing his nose from the rectum of the poeple he covers ain't his thing, either
 
ESPN knew through an anonymous source but they figured they would get it wrong anyway so they didn't break the story.
 
Given what his own son went through, I'm hardly surprised Simms kept his mouth shut.

I don't think he did anything wrong.
 
goalmouth said:
Phil Simms told Mike & Mike this morning that he knew about Peyton Manning's second surgery but decided not to say anything publicly "because breaking news isn't my thing."

Sheesh.

neither is good color work or siring nfl quarterbacks
 
I am fully in support of Phil's behavior here.
No problem with any of it.
There's no story here, unless you are one of those media types who likes to chastise other media types for "keeping secrets"
This is really a non-issue item.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Have nothing against him as a commentator.

Have serious problems with his anger-management issues.
I've seen him treat some service people EXCEEDINGLY badly.
 
He's an ex-jock, not a journalist, so it's not surprising that he wouldn't report that information. Might have been nice if he'd mentioned it to someone at CBS who actually has some news judgment, though.
 
If Phil Simms had broken something that was "newsworthy" and been wrong, people here would have crucified him for trying to be a journalist, a la Kirk Herbstreit's incorrect "breaking news" story last year.

He's a color commentator, not a journalist. If he wants to go public with what he knows, that's his prerogative.

He still sucks at commentating though.
 
" I knew that too Dog. I just choose not to say. Someone called me about it from the hospital"

/Mike Francesa
 
CollegeJournalist said:
If Phil Simms had broken something that was "newsworthy" and been wrong, people here would have crucified him for trying to be a journalist, a la Kirk Herbstreit's incorrect "breaking news" story last year.

He's a color commentator, not a journalist. If he wants to go public with what he knows, that's his prerogative.

He still sucks at commentating though.

The parallel to Kirk Herbstreit works best. He got grilled for his attempt to break news.

Phil Simms has never pretended to be a journalist. He analyzes and comments on games and events, but has shown no urge whatsoever to break news.
 
mustangj17 said:
ESPN knew through an anonymous source but they figured they would get it wrong anyway so they didn't break the story.

That's not their M.O.

They have to wait for someone else to break it, then ESPN will take the credit for breaking the story.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top