F
Fenian_Bastard
Guest
Good point about the "what about the children?" crowd.
As to the rest, eh.
As to the rest, eh.
JayFarrar said:From one of my favorite op/ed columnists ...
...Lately, though, it’s become harder to tell the sports page from the rest of the newspaper. Largely due to money and TV celebrity, jocks now draw outsized personal scrutiny once reserved for Hollywood actors, Washington politicians, serial killers and girl singers who misplace their underpants. Mostly, it’s merely annoying to see sports commentators posing as moral arbiters, prosecutor, judge and jury.
IF I didn't get caught cheating on that Psych final senior year, I would have had a 3.7 GPA.buckweaver said:The Big Ragu said:It's not about who my kids should admire. It's about who earned their way in. Cobb obviously did. McGwire was Dave Kingman, until he suddenly became Babe Ruth at an age most guys are declining. It's fair to think that he was a mediocre player--one who barely broke .200 one season before he began cheating--made great by artificial means. And given that, it's fair if you believe he doesn't deserve induction, as a result.
Agree with that, absolutely 100%.
And to add to that: Bonds earned his way in, too. The steroids are unfortunate -- but IF Bonds retires in 1998, he's already in the Hall as we speak.
That's like winning the midget slam-dunk contest.Angola! said:I thought it was one of his best columns in recent memory.
Columbo said:IF I didn't get caught cheating on that Psych final senior year, I would have had a 3.7 GPA.buckweaver said:The Big Ragu said:It's not about who my kids should admire. It's about who earned their way in. Cobb obviously did. McGwire was Dave Kingman, until he suddenly became Babe Ruth at an age most guys are declining. It's fair to think that he was a mediocre player--one who barely broke .200 one season before he began cheating--made great by artificial means. And given that, it's fair if you believe he doesn't deserve induction, as a result.
Agree with that, absolutely 100%.
And to add to that: Bonds earned his way in, too. The steroids are unfortunate -- but IF Bonds retires in 1998, he's already in the Hall as we speak.
Instead, I was expelled from school.
Ridiculous seamhead rationalization will get Bonds in every time.
This country has lost its honor.
I agree with you.The Big Ragu said:Columbo said:IF I didn't get caught cheating on that Psych final senior year, I would have had a 3.7 GPA.buckweaver said:The Big Ragu said:It's not about who my kids should admire. It's about who earned their way in. Cobb obviously did. McGwire was Dave Kingman, until he suddenly became Babe Ruth at an age most guys are declining. It's fair to think that he was a mediocre player--one who barely broke .200 one season before he began cheating--made great by artificial means. And given that, it's fair if you believe he doesn't deserve induction, as a result.
Agree with that, absolutely 100%.
And to add to that: Bonds earned his way in, too. The steroids are unfortunate -- but IF Bonds retires in 1998, he's already in the Hall as we speak.
Instead, I was expelled from school.
Ridiculous seamhead rationalization will get Bonds in every time.
This country has lost its honor.
I'm actually with you on this. I don't believe Bonds is deserving. And it's a shame. Unlike McGwire, in my opinion, Bonds would have been a Hall of Famer without the drugs. The fact that he cheated anyhow, disgusts me more than the marginal player who cheats. I have a lot of understanding for a guy who is staring at a career in the minor leagues and sees all the players competing with him for spots using roids, so he uses to give himself an even chance. If he makes the majors, it makes sense why he would use, when he's perilously hanging onto to that last roster spot, knowing the guy behind him very well might cheat to snare his job. That guy is cheating to save his job. You can't say that about Bonds. His ego couldn't bear "just" being an all-time great. It's kind of disgusting.
PhilaYank36 said:In my humble opinion, I think McGwire would garner a lot of votes if he just simply manned-up and came clean about all the **** he did.
The Big Ragu said:PhilaYank36 said:In my humble opinion, I think McGwire would garner a lot of votes if he just simply manned-up and came clean about all the **** he did. That's probably what pisses everyone off: McGwire just doesn't have the courage to own up for his actions. Even though it is tired, the "Ty Cobb is in" argument is valid. Who would you rather have your kids look up to and idolize: Cobb or McGwire?
It's not about who my kids should admire. It's about who earned their way in. Cobb obviously did. McGwire was Dave Kingman, until he suddenly became Babe Ruth at an age most guys are declining. It's fair to think that he was a mediocre player--one who barely broke .200 one season before he began cheating--made great by artificial means. And given that, it's fair if you believe he doesn't deserve induction, as a result.
Someone else on this board knows how to read.Ace said:The Big Ragu said:PhilaYank36 said:In my humble opinion, I think McGwire would garner a lot of votes if he just simply manned-up and came clean about all the **** he did. That's probably what pisses everyone off: McGwire just doesn't have the courage to own up for his actions. Even though it is tired, the "Ty Cobb is in" argument is valid. Who would you rather have your kids look up to and idolize: Cobb or McGwire?
It's not about who my kids should admire. It's about who earned their way in. Cobb obviously did. McGwire was Dave Kingman, until he suddenly became Babe Ruth at an age most guys are declining. It's fair to think that he was a mediocre player--one who barely broke .200 one season before he began cheating--made great by artificial means. And given that, it's fair if you believe he doesn't deserve induction, as a result.
I'm with Ragu here. Pint-size Barry Bonds still would have been a Hall of Famer. Pre-muscle man McGwire no way.
And the "protecting the kids thing" is not accurate. Killion wasn't protecting her kids. She was trying to be honest with them.
Columbo said:JayFarrar said:From one of my favorite op/ed columnists ...
...Lately, though, it’s become harder to tell the sports page from the rest of the newspaper. Largely due to money and TV celebrity, jocks now draw outsized personal scrutiny once reserved for Hollywood actors, Washington politicians, serial killers and girl singers who misplace their underpants. Mostly, it’s merely annoying to see sports commentators posing as moral arbiters, prosecutor, judge and jury.
As long as the rich never have to face the justice system that 95 percent of us face, it is incumbent on writers to become judge and jury, if they are informed.
Ashy Larry said:Columbo said:JayFarrar said:From one of my favorite op/ed columnists ...
...Lately, though, its become harder to tell the sports page from the rest of the newspaper. Largely due to money and TV celebrity, jocks now draw outsized personal scrutiny once reserved for Hollywood actors, Washington politicians, serial killers and girl singers who misplace their underpants. Mostly, its merely annoying to see sports commentators posing as moral arbiters, prosecutor, judge and jury.
As long as the rich never have to face the justice system that 95 percent of us face, it is incumbent on writers to become judge and jury, if they are informed.
are ****in' kidding me?