JR said:I don't care if it's the ****ing Evil Empire, go back and pay up.
Zeke12 said:For those advocating that he go back and pay extra, one question:
They estimated the bill at $115, billed him $95. Had the work come out to $140, do you think they'd have charged him the estimated price or the full price?
Because it sounds to me like the guy just comped the lightbulb labor.
buckweaver said:Zeke12 said:For those advocating that he go back and pay extra, one question:
They estimated the bill at $115, billed him $95. Had the work come out to $140, do you think they'd have charged him the estimated price or the full price?
Because it sounds to me like the guy just comped the lightbulb labor.
Bingo. Plus, a lot of car-repair places will offer to comp a small charge if you agree to have the bigger operation done. I just had that happen last week at the place where I get my oil change. No big deal.
Mystery Meat said:Cashiers get fired over cashier errors. Unless you'd like to advocate for reporters getting fired for a factual error in a story, you shouldn't be so blithe about something that you would CERTAINLY have drama with had that $20 error gone against you.
Zeke12 said:But that isn't what happened, here.
It's not a situation where the guy's bank isn't going to match the register tape. Our narrator paid what was on the bill.
In this case, he merely was charged less than what was estimated. Not common, but it happens. And, as buckdub and ducky say, it happens fairly often when you're having multiple things done to a car -- often because they comp some of the simple labor.
My guess is the guy was either simply being nice or didn't know how to ring in the more expensive headlight charge, so rang in a cheaper service.
Either way, I think in this case, our guy is free and clear ethically.
Boom_70 said:I just had my car demagnified at Sears. $40 bucks for the whole car. Can already tell the difference.
Mystery Meat said:Zeke12 said:But that isn't what happened, here.
It's not a situation where the guy's bank isn't going to match the register tape. Our narrator paid what was on the bill.
In this case, he merely was charged less than what was estimated. Not common, but it happens. And, as buckdub and ducky say, it happens fairly often when you're having multiple things done to a car -- often because they comp some of the simple labor.
My guess is the guy was either simply being nice or didn't know how to ring in the more expensive headlight charge, so rang in a cheaper service.
Either way, I think in this case, our guy is free and clear ethically.
I was responding to those who said that since it was a cashier error, that meant he was in the clear. Or on the clear. Stupid Barry Bonds. If you think you might have been undercharged and the receipt says otherwise, then legally you're in the clear, but if you knew for sure that, let's say, they forgot to charge you for something, then morally you should go back.