Sark ties one on

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

dm_130930_ncf_pat_haden_on_kiffin_firing.jpg


Needs no artificial stupidifiers.
 
Gary Moeller wonders what the big deal is. Seriously, Sarkisian wasn't a home run hire when he arrived. Probably needs to at least win the South division to stay on.
 
Seriously, Sarkisian wasn't a home run hire when he arrived. Probably needs to at least win the South division to stay on.

It's his second year and he's Pat Haden's guy. He's got at least two more years.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Would you hire him?

If you fire him he may sue over his "disability".

No, I wouldn't hire him. But every coach who gets fired for cause seems to challenge it in the courts, so this is hardly disqualifying.
 
Mike Price got hired again. But he ruined his career path.
 
USC might be in trouble because of that initial decision to let him go to rehab and work through it then fire him, what was it, 24 hours later? Coming to work drunk/under the influence and embarrassing a school/an organization is a fireable offense. He was rightfully fired, but the mishandling of it for that brief "he's going to rehab; no, we're going to fire him" could cost the university.
 
BUMP...
Suing USC seeking $30 million.
Claims his alcoholism is a disability.
Prolly going to cost USC some $$$ to settle.

Forgot the link ...
http://www.tmz.com/2015/12/07/steve-sarkisian-sues-usc/

Haden ****ed USC right in the ass with his statement that Sark "isn't well," made when the firing was announced. Whether you believe alcoholism is an illness or a weakness, that comment showed he considers it an illness. You don't say something like that when you're firing someone for cause.

Haden also screwed the pooch with the suspension for him to get help before the season, followed by letting him return despite him not getting help. He should have remained suspended until he completed an in-patient program at a facility, then allowed to return only if he signed an agreement that allowed for random testing and a firing for cause if he drinks a drop of alcohol.

I'm sure this will be settled and not go to court, but if it is and all these people who knew he was a drunk at Washington are paraded into court, showing what a horrible job Haden did of vetting Sark, it will only get more ugly for USC.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top