I lost my grandfather to Alzheimer's as a teenager, and that's still probably the worst experience of my (charmed) life. This man who I had admired and loved so fiercely just disappeared into himself. After he died, I remember asking my father, a stoic man, why he didn't appear to be grieving, and his response was "I lost him a long time ago." It's a horrid, evil disease, and I imagine Smith's family feels some measure of peace with their grief today. He was living, but he wasn't alive.
When would the right time be? It shouldn't be that difficult to write one more paragraph, even if that graf is the one that's not all peaches and cream.Probably not the time. That would be like mentioning altar boy abuse in the Pope's obit.
No he doesn't. The situations are very different. The "no show" classes didn't start until two years after Smith retired and UNC gave a former federal prosecutor carte blanche to get to the bottom of it. That prosecutor found no evidence Smith did anything wrong and it's not even clear if any of Smith's players benefitted.
The behavior that caused UMass and Memphis' Final Fours to be vacated occurred while he was coach and neither university did anything comparable to what UNC has done to investigate the matters.
Head coaches know better than to let anything get traced back directly to them. That's my point. Fifty-four Dean Smith players took paper classes and it all started on his watch. That has to be a part of his legacy, even if it's a small part compared to his activism and on-court contributions. Especially when you consider that at least one former UNC player is essentially saying the institutionalized academic fraud undermined some of the civil rights work Dean Smith did.
You clearly don't understand the findings of the Wainstein report. Have you even read it?