My biggest problem with AP right now - and maybe it's just perception - but it appears they sit on stories that are already completed. They send out that 40-word NewsNow that nobody uses. Some of them are for features and already read like the start of a feature, giving you the impression the finished product is already there. However, my impression is that far too often AP sits on it to keep a story flow going in a set amount of time (i.e. get the NewsNow on the wire within 10 minutes of a game ending, then the no-quote lead on the wire within 25-30 minutes). When I was a stringer for AP, we had to have baseball game stories in the bureau after the seventh inning, then we just updated as we went along. That would presumably get them on the wire almost immediately upon the completion of a game. However, now that I'm saddled with far more desk work than I care to perform, I am stunned at how long it takes to get even the 100-or-so-word AP baseball story. If we're on deadline and a Tigers game ends 15 within 10 minutes of deadline, we just skip it - there's no chance we'll have the 100-word story in time.
I didn't like the format AP used in spring training, primarily because there were notes on both teams. In Michigan, readers won't care about the changes in the Cardinals' batting lineup. You might as well pitch half the notes automatically.