Revised subject: If allowed, would most female spouses prefer life as the boss?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Status
Not open for further replies.

dog eat dog world

New Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2012
Messages
2,325
Here's the story:
Friend of mine has turned down golf outings several times of late. I have this conversation with my wife about it and she said "oh...(recognizing that a friend of his wife's is a friend of hers)....she goes on to tell me that they've picked up a new method of relating to one another.....called a female-led relationship. The key is that he's not playing golf because she takes him shopping, to craft shows, etc. She apparently runs the money (that's not unusual when the guy can't control his spending), but she also decides their social life....everything goes through her for permission, that kind of thing. So she says, "sounds good to me."..then googles it and says, "naaah, thats too twisted" (and it seems to be linked to the bdsm bit.

But it got me to wondering, outside of the twisted stuff, is the rest of this kind of reverse role playing more normal than I think, or would women prefer this? I mean, I don't want to try and stereotype to offend but most women I know don't have the passionate interest in sports unless their kids are playing and would just as likely be at the mall...and to me, would have their minds blown if their hub "liked" shopping with her.

Me? I have trouble giving up a round of golf. Wish my wife would learn the game though. Shopping? I'm one of those guys who gets yanked into the display where five guys are in between a round hanger of dresses with a tv on and a case of beer, watching football.
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

You have to do a better job of coming up with your fake stories and your straw men.

freqposter is conducting a seminar. 5:00 Wednesday at the Marriott ballroom in Des Moines. Turn left at the cornfield.
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

LongTimeListener said:
You have to do a better job of coming up with your fake stories and your straw men.

freqposter is conducting a seminar. 5:00 Wednesday at the Marriott ballroom in Des Moines. Turn left at the cornfield.
[/quote
LongTimeListener said:
You have to do a better job of coming up with your fake stories and your straw men.

freqposter is conducting a seminar. 5:00 Wednesday at the Marriott ballroom in Des Moines. Turn left at the cornfield.

Right. You've never been consistently turned down for golf?
C'
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

That first post is barely coherent. Do you understand syntax and grammar at all?
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

Besides, if I let my wife handle the finances, my golf game would go to **** far worse than it has now.
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

0806520574.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

Good gosh, trying to have some fun with a topic and some ass comes in and starts criticizing sentence structure. Lighten up, Dreunc.

But for your benefit, killing the setup to the question to get to the point for your mfing benefit: how many would consider normal a relationship where the woman makes all the decisions and controls all the finances and the social agenda? Is that effing clear enough?
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

dog eat dog world said:
My effing question is how many would consider normal a relationship where the woman makes all the decisions and controls all the finances and the social agenda?

Would you consider the converse "normal"?
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

Is this sports or news?

To answer your question, there are some guys out there who allow their wives to control everything about their social lives. Either scared of confrontation, or just big pusses, or just love their wife's company more than guys.
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

**** Whitman said:
dog eat dog world said:
My effing question is how many would consider normal a relationship where the woman makes all the decisions and controls all the finainces and the social agenda?

Would you consider the converse "normal"?
It's a give and take I guess. Over time, the "traditional" sense of one being head of house has changed....but historically, men were the dominant figure in a household. Considering this question was posed by ****, I'm almost paranoid it's going to become political. lol.

That being said, some of my conservative buddies think men have been had been de-manned in this culture.
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

Next on Maury: "I Have No Interest In Spending Time With This Annoying Guy, So Can I Ditch Him And Blame It On My Wife?"
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

poindexter said:
Is this sports or news?
****, I'm sorry. I thought I posted it on anything goes. Can it be moved?
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

dog eat dog world said:
**** Whitman said:
dog eat dog world said:
My effing question is how many would consider normal a relationship where the woman makes all the decisions and controls all the finainces and the social agenda?

Would you consider the converse "normal"?
It's a give and take I guess.

So, in other words: It's not normal. But neither would it be normal for the man to completely control the agenda.

Seems simple enough.
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

**** Whitman said:
dog eat dog world said:
**** Whitman said:
dog eat dog world said:
My effing question is how many would consider normal a relationship where the woman makes all the decisions and controls all the finainces and the social agenda?

Would you consider the converse "normal"?
It's a give and take I guess.

So, in other words: It's not normal. But neither would it be normal for the man to completely control the agenda.

Seems simple enough.

**** Whitman said:
dog eat dog world said:
**** Whitman said:
dog eat dog world said:
My effing question is how many would consider normal a relationship where the woman makes all the decisions and controls all the finainces and the social agenda?

Would you consider the converse "normal"?
It's a give and take I guess.

So, in other words: It's not normal. But neither would it be normal for the man to completely control the agenda.

Seems simple enough.

I get you, but it went one way for centuries. Would it shift the other way without the axis being loosened? I mean with "Stepford Wives" came the movie "Stepford Husbands." lmao...
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

If the point of this can be boiled down to, "does dog eat dog's wife have carte blanche to beat the **** out of him" than I'm all in favor. Enjoy your new gimp existence.
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

dog eat dog world said:
**** Whitman said:
dog eat dog world said:
**** Whitman said:
dog eat dog world said:
My effing question is how many would consider normal a relationship where the woman makes all the decisions and controls all the finainces and the social agenda?

Would you consider the converse "normal"?
It's a give and take I guess.

So, in other words: It's not normal. But neither would it be normal for the man to completely control the agenda.

Seems simple enough.

**** Whitman said:
dog eat dog world said:
**** Whitman said:
dog eat dog world said:
My effing question is how many would consider normal a relationship where the woman makes all the decisions and controls all the finainces and the social agenda?

Would you consider the converse "normal"?
It's a give and take I guess.

So, in other words: It's not normal. But neither would it be normal for the man to completely control the agenda.

Seems simple enough.

I get you, but it went one way for centuries.

So?
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

It wouldn't be normal for only one person to make all the decisions. In a loving relationship those should be discussed, shared and agreed upon.

What a stupid ****ing scenario. Shopping over golf because she says so? Grow some balls.
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

Bubbler said:
If the point of this can be boiled down to, "does dog eat dog's wife have carte blanche to beat the **** out of him" than I'm all in favor. Enjoy your new gimp existence.

Y-E-S
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

But more toward the middle, wives will typically say that their husbands don't venture into their world, so to speak....(their interests, etc.). I'm sorry, but shopping at the mall is one of the most hideous forms of torture I can imagine. If I could do all my Christmas shopping at the "Get In, Get Out," I would. Would any guy in here admit to enjoying shopping with the Mrs., at say, at Bath and Body Works or to a lesser extent, Dillards?
 
Re: Well, hey, maybe it's a win-win if the female is the head of the household.

dog eat dog world said:
But more toward the middle, wives will typically say that their husbands don't venture into their world, so to speak....(their interests, etc.). I'm sorry, but shopping at the mall is one of the most hideous forms of torture I can imagine. If I could do all my Christmas shopping at the "Get In, Get Out," I would. Would any guy in here admit to enjoying shopping with the Mrs., at say, at Bath and Body Works or to a lesser extent, Dillards?

I'm not sure my wife enjoyed going to see "Moneyball" the night it opened.

But she did.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top