Reggie Bush is going to lose his Heisman

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Firstime Caller said:
Batman said:
So we've had the USC three-peat, which by AP standards was a two-peat, but in reality was a one-peat. Does this make it a no-peat? [/LSUfanboy]

Love it, Batman. Never really had anything against USC until I started encountering some of their alums while covering pro sports and now that I live in PAC 10 country. And it just drives me crazy how snotty they are towards LSU and the SEC. Really really nasty. So I'd LOVE for them to get titles stripped.

It goes both ways, though. LSU fans have blasted USC ever since the split national championship, like this was the first time that ever happened with the polls. As Les Miles' preseason comments indicated, they just can't let it go.
 
Del_B_Vista said:
I know Cleveland State gets hammered whenever Kentucky violates in basketball. Who gets it for USC in football? Cal Poly-SLO?

Bingo. Beat me to it, Del.

Either them or San Diego St.
 
These topic titles really reflect the biz as a whole
Big headlines grab readers' attention and sell the product

I doubt Reggie Bush will lose his Heisman Trophy.
It would be so unprecedented.
Does anyone think Eric Dickerson and Craig James weren't being paid money while at SMU.
And those guys aren't in any way tainted today. Both are lauded for their past performances.
Losing the Heisman just ain't gonna happen.
 
Pilot said:
Hammer Pants said:
What do you mean by skates? This could be a loss of insitutional control, if the NCAA can prove some of these claims. You think SC didn't see all the nice stuff he had while he was there? The coaches who recruited him knew his family didn't have that kind of money.

Oh no!! Not lack of institutional control!!!

They'll lose about three scholarships for two years. Big fricken whoop.

Until the NCAA deploys teeth to back its policies, no one's going to worry too much about violating them. Look at KU. They are smack in the middle of serving a "lack of institutional control" sentence and I think they're surviving.

Bitchslapped Alabama pretty good a few years ago.
 
I could be wrong, but I think SMU got hit so hard because they not only cheated, and got caught, but lied to the NCAA during the investitgation, and continued to cheat while the investigation was going on.

Having said that, if the NCAA is always concerned about "extra benefits" for athletes, then why not let each athlete earn whatever the marketplace wants to give him. Any other student can have people loan them money. If someone wants to give Bush a car, let them. I'm no athlete, but when I went away to college, a neighbor of my parents sent me homemade cookies several times. If I was an athlete, that would have been an NCAA violation.
 
buckweaver said:
Piotr Rasputin said:
Del_B_Vista said:
I know Cleveland State gets hammered whenever Kentucky violates in basketball. Who gets it for USC in football? Cal Poly-SLO?

LongBeachStateLogo.jpg

pulpfictionjulesvincentsantacruz.jpg
You guys look like a couple of dorks.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Ben_Hecht said:
NCAA doesn't have the nerve to bitchslap Southern Cal as they should be bitchslapped.

Don't. Have. The. Guts.
Weber State is so screwed... OK, more screwed than normal, but you catch the drift
 
The NCAA will force Cleveland State to start a football program, then immediately give it the death penalty.
 
Ben_Hecht said:
NCAA doesn't have the nerve to bitchslap Southern Cal as they should be bitchslapped.

Don't. Have. The. Guts.

Well, they may not have any choice now. Yahoo moved the story forward today. Apparently the investigators heard tapes of Reggie incriminating himself. Can't see how the NCAA can get out of letting Bush AND Southern Cal off. Someone is going to have to take the fall. I still thinki it's gonna be Bush and that Heisman.

http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/news;_ylt=AnCQNp36uHId1KZQ32jNpmY5nYcB?slug=ys-bush110807&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
 
If they want back to the 50's the DAC would have to take them all back.
 
At this point in his life, more than midway through his NFL career, a lucrative if spotty one, why should Bush CARE what happens to his Heisman Trophy?
 
Why should Bush have his Heisman taken away?
There are a few Heisman winners who have ended up in jail and still have their trophies. Bush did nothing criminal.
This is total bull****.
 
There are a few Heisman winners who have ended up in jail and still have their trophies.

Where you "end up" 5, 10 or 20 years later is of no consequence.

But if you are ruled to have been ineligible WHILE YOU WERE WINNING the trophy, then you don't get to keep the trophy.
 
Is it remarkable that this thread (and likewise the investigation) was started three years ago, and the chips are still falling? Does it really take this long to close the book on a story that was already essentially written in the fall of 2007?

I know it's not that simple, but there has to be a better way to investigate and litigate this stuff.
 
The Heisman is for amateur athletes, a category to which Bush did not belong when he won the trophy.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top