"On The Mark" Rises From The Ashes!

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Boom_70

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2002
Messages
43,823
The columnist that Luppy had dumped from the Daily News is back with Fox Sport- Mark kriegel.

His weekly column - "On the Mark" is also back-- funny and biting as it always was. Also the reason why luppy wanted Kriegel dumped. On the Mark was actually funny and it made Shooting from the Lip look lame.

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6811276
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
Damn, Boom. Best news you've ever posted.

Fenian - something we can agree on. I sorely missed "On The Mark" for past 5 years. I could not believe my eyes when reading the Fox story on Billy Donavan I see a picture of Kriegel.

Found this gem:

Los Angeles is a strange place for a New Yorker. I've seen things almost too horrible to recount. Grown men on skateboards. People wearing sunglasses while eating in diners. Armies of women with yoga mats laying siege to the city of Santa Monica.

I'm telling you, it's rough out here.

I can't even find a pair of Starbury's
 
Kriegel has not lost his touch in his 5 year column hiatus.

Found this gem on A-Rod:

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6868094
 
I like Kriegel a lot too. Good stuff... But my first thoughts were:

Boom has a mancrush! Boom has a mancrush!

or... thanks for stopping by Mark!...
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Apparently they brought in some new management/editorial guys there to crank things up....glad to see Kriegel on a national platform.
 
The Big Ragu said:
I like Kriegel a lot too. Good stuff... But my first thoughts were:

Boom has a mancrush! Boom has a mancrush!

or... thanks for stopping by Mark!...

It's more of a crush on words - words strung together well that make me think and make me laugh.

5 years ago when the News dumped him, Kriegel was the best sports columnist in NY. It will be interesting to see what rest of country thinks now that he will be national.
 
This is just outstanding, even if Chucky will disagree with Kriegel's point vis-a-vis Kobe: http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/6883282



I found myself wondering if Kobe was watching. I sure hoped he was, as he had subjected me to a miserable couple of days during which he thought to air his demands. Said demands might be summarized thusly:

Trade me. I want to be a Laker. Trade me. I want to be a Laker. Trade me. I want to be a Laker for life.

Lindsay Lohan, recently arrested on suspicion of drunk driving, made more sense when she cracked up her convertible on Sunset.

Last month, on the eve of the Cavaliers engagement with the Nets, Richard Jefferson was asked to assess the degree of difficulty in trying to guard James. The key, said Jefferson, was "he gets his teammates involved...It's not just the LeBron show. He's not a Kobe Bryant where he's just going to go out there and score at all costs."

Great players are supposed to endow the players around them with greatness. Kobe Bryant does not. While James is about winning, Kobe is about Kobe.

In relation to his teammates, Bryant inhabits a parallel universe, separate and unequal. Perhaps you recall former Laker Chucky Atkins remarking with some frustration, "Kobe's the GM of this team." I'll not forget the way he showed up his teammate, Luke Walton, who had the temerity to pass the ball back to him during an overtime loss to the Knicks. And while there's some fantastic revisionism emanating from the Lakers' high command, you may remember that even his own coach couldn't stand him.

You think anything has really changed?

Kobe Bryant doesn't instill confidence in the guys in the locker room. He communicates by text message.
 
hockeybeat said:
This is just outstanding, even if Chucky will disagree with Kriegel's point vis-a-vis Kobe: http://msn.foxsports.com/nba/story/6883282



I found myself wondering if Kobe was watching. I sure hoped he was, as he had subjected me to a miserable couple of days during which he thought to air his demands. Said demands might be summarized thusly:

Trade me. I want to be a Laker. Trade me. I want to be a Laker. Trade me. I want to be a Laker for life.

Lindsay Lohan, recently arrested on suspicion of drunk driving, made more sense when she cracked up her convertible on Sunset.

Last month, on the eve of the Cavaliers engagement with the Nets, Richard Jefferson was asked to assess the degree of difficulty in trying to guard James. The key, said Jefferson, was "he gets his teammates involved...It's not just the LeBron show. He's not a Kobe Bryant where he's just going to go out there and score at all costs."

Great players are supposed to endow the players around them with greatness. Kobe Bryant does not. While James is about winning, Kobe is about Kobe.

In relation to his teammates, Bryant inhabits a parallel universe, separate and unequal. Perhaps you recall former Laker Chucky Atkins remarking with some frustration, "Kobe's the GM of this team." I'll not forget the way he showed up his teammate, Luke Walton, who had the temerity to pass the ball back to him during an overtime loss to the Knicks. And while there's some fantastic revisionism emanating from the Lakers' high command, you may remember that even his own coach couldn't stand him.

You think anything has really changed?

Kobe Bryant doesn't instill confidence in the guys in the locker room. He communicates by text message.

This is quality stuff right here:

"Trade me. I want to be a Laker. Trade me. I want to be a Laker. Trade me. I want to be a Laker for life.

Lindsay Lohan, recently arrested on suspicion of drunk driving, made more sense when she cracked up her convertible on Sunset."
 
Damn, that dude can write.

Wish my paper had a columnist that good.
 
Guy_Incognito said:
Boom_70 said:
Kriegel has not lost his touch in his 5 year column hiatus.

Found this gem on A-Rod:

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6868094

I mean, how invincibly stupid is this guy?

Invincibly stupid?

What's the problem?

My favorite NYDN days used to be Wednesdays, when Kriegel would write in sports, and Stanley Crouch and the late, great Lars-Erik Nelson would tee it up on the op-ed.
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
Guy_Incognito said:
Boom_70 said:
Kriegel has not lost his touch in his 5 year column hiatus.

Found this gem on A-Rod:

http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6868094

I mean, how invincibly stupid is this guy?

Invincibly stupid?

What's the problem?

What does invincible mean? Maybe I'm wrong, I'm the one who's not a pro, but can it modify stupid? I didn't think so.
 
It means that his stupidity is unconquerable, even by the actual facts and literal reality. He believes what he believes despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
It means that his stupidity is unconquerable, even by the actual facts and literal reality. He believes what he believes despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
It sounds very awkward to me.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top