Oceans 13

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Riddick

Active Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2002
Messages
2,688
After watching the second one, I didn't know what to expect. But this one was certainly worth the price of admission. Almost as good as the first one.
Like Rocky V, I pretend Oceans 12 didn't exist.
 
I watched Ocean's 12 last month for the first time since I saw it in the theatre. The only time it approached the first one, I thought, was the scene with the cryptic dialogue where Damon quotes Led Zeppelin.
But the first one was so good, I will have to go see this one.
 
O12 was no better, or worse, than O11, as I am sure O13 isn't, either.

A bunch of Hollywood demigods-in-their-own-minds schmooze their way through a far-fetched plot, with a bunch of random semi-twists and insider jokes thrown in, everybody wears cool clothes and goes some awesome places, everything clicks into place, and everybody walks away chuckling at the end.

O12 got a couple of bonus points for Catherine Zeta-Jones, absent (along with Julia Roberts) from 13.

CZJ and Julia have been replaced as female eye-candy by, I am told, Ellen Barkin, who is 53, and looks every minute of it. Bleeehhhh. Couldn't they have nabbed a couple of mid-30s/early 40s babes (think Diane Lane, Marisa Tomei, Jennifer Connelly) to spice up the scenery? Whatsa matter, was Diane Keaton busy or something? Meryl Streep busy washing her hair?

I may go see it at the dollar matinees, or more likely, wait until it hits cable.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Julia Roberts = not as attractive as she thinks.

Thirteen will be just as good as the first two because it is the exact same formula. If you liked the first, you'll like this one.
 
Clooney's Ocean's 11 was good, and if I was to ever have a man crush it would be on Clooney. But his film was nowhere near as good as the Rat Pack version. Granted, Sinatra's gang just wanted an excuse to party and drink in Vegas and Clooney's version actually had the semblance of a plot, but Clooney's film was just too smooth, too polished.

Also, Sinatra, Martin, Davis >>> Clooney, Pitt, Damon

P.S. The original's ending was a lot better, too.
 
I'm a big fan of the franchise, but I didn't think 13 was anywhere near as good as 11. Much closer to 12. I do believe it's run its course.
 
Starman said:
O12 was no better, or worse, than O11, as I am sure O13 isn't, either.

Incorrect. Ocean's 12 was absolute ****, made even worse by an unwatchable subplot involving Tess' resemblance to ... Julia Roberts. ::) Gee, ya think? Ocean's 11 was vastly superior to 12.

A bunch of Hollywood demigods-in-their-own-minds schmooze their way through a far-fetched plot, with a bunch of random semi-twists and insider jokes thrown in, everybody wears cool clothes and goes some awesome places, everything clicks into place, and everybody walks away chuckling at the end.

Uh, yeah and that's kind of the point: It's entertainment. It's a ****ing movie; you pays your seven bucks and walk away thinking, "Gee, that was silly but it was fun."

O12 got a couple of bonus points for Catherine Zeta-Jones, absent (along with Julia Roberts) from 13.

Saving the budget and keeping a couple of star egos out of the way.

And Marisa Tomei couldn't act her way out of jury duty and has no business being mentioned with a cast of this pedigree.
 
Oceans 11 was a fun flick, nothing more...

Oceans 12 was complete ****... The whole Julia Roberts storyline had me wanting to walk out...
 
Ocean's 12 was so bad I couldn't even fall asleep during it. Saw it Christmas night after a long day of driving and wolfing down food and figured I would doze off. But it was so bad I kept watching it, waiting for it to suck less.

Never happened.
 
2muchcoffeeman said:
And Marisa Tomei couldn't act her way out of jury duty and has no business being mentioned with a cast of this pedigree.

Tomei's got an Academy Award for Cousin Vinny and was great in The Paper. She acts just fine.
 
BYH said:
Ocean's 12 was so bad I couldn't even fall asleep during it. Saw it Christmas night after a long day of driving and wolfing down food and figured I would doze off. But it was so bad I kept watching it, waiting for it to suck less.

Never happened.
Holy ****.... so well put.
 
2muchcoffeeman said:
Starman said:
O12 was no better, or worse, than O11, as I am sure O13 isn't, either.

Incorrect. Ocean's 12 was absolute ****, made even worse by an unwatchable subplot involving Tess' resemblance to ... Julia Roberts. ::) Gee, ya think? Ocean's 11 was vastly superior to 12.

A bunch of Hollywood demigods-in-their-own-minds schmooze their way through a far-fetched plot, with a bunch of random semi-twists and insider jokes thrown in, everybody wears cool clothes and goes some awesome places, everything clicks into place, and everybody walks away chuckling at the end.

Uh, yeah and that's kind of the point: It's entertainment. It's a ****ing movie; you pays your seven bucks and walk away thinking, "Gee, that was silly but it was fun."

O12 got a couple of bonus points for Catherine Zeta-Jones, absent (along with Julia Roberts) from 13.

Saving the budget and keeping a couple of star egos out of the way.

And Marisa Tomei couldn't act her way out of jury duty and has no business being mentioned with a cast of this pedigree.

What's this burgeoning consensus that O11 was some towering cinematic masterpiece?
O11 and O12 were pretty much identical -- mildly amusing, no better no worse.

The Julia Roberts subplot in O12 was cliched and lame, but no more so than the other subplots. We ain't watching these movies for deeply-structured plots.

Who gives a **** about the producers saving money on their budget? It's their money, they've got plenty, let 'em spend it.

I don't care if Marisa Tomei can or can't out-act Ellen Barkin, Master Thespienne (I suspect she can). All I know is she is about 10 years younger than Ellen Barkin, looks about 20 years younger, and if you're selling a major star-driven Hollywood movie, and your featured female lead is Ellen Barkin, y'all's in a heap of trouble.
 
O11 was fun and somewhat of a money grab. Made no sense a lot of the time, but you had a feeling that the actors were having a great time.

012 was a pure money grab. The inside jokes overwhelmed the movie. The plot made even less sense than the first. In fact, I still don't know what the hell happened.

As with the first two, I'll wait until 013 comes out on cable.
 
Starman said:
2muchcoffeeman said:
Starman said:
O12 was no better, or worse, than O11, as I am sure O13 isn't, either.

Incorrect. Ocean's 12 was absolute ****, made even worse by an unwatchable subplot involving Tess' resemblance to ... Julia Roberts. ::) Gee, ya think? Ocean's 11 was vastly superior to 12.

A bunch of Hollywood demigods-in-their-own-minds schmooze their way through a far-fetched plot, with a bunch of random semi-twists and insider jokes thrown in, everybody wears cool clothes and goes some awesome places, everything clicks into place, and everybody walks away chuckling at the end.

Uh, yeah and that's kind of the point: It's entertainment. It's a ****ing movie; you pays your seven bucks and walk away thinking, "Gee, that was silly but it was fun."

O12 got a couple of bonus points for Catherine Zeta-Jones, absent (along with Julia Roberts) from 13.

Saving the budget and keeping a couple of star egos out of the way.

And Marisa Tomei couldn't act her way out of jury duty and has no business being mentioned with a cast of this pedigree.

What's this burgeoning consensus that O11 was some towering cinematic masterpiece?
O11 and O12 were pretty much identical -- mildly amusing, no better no worse.

Applying the Roger Ebert test, 11 was a towering masterpiece while 12 was a towering failure. Ocean's 11 was precisely the movie it set out to be --- a tightly-scripted piece of entertainment which both the actors and the audience thoroughly enjoyed. Ocean's 12 was badly scripted and I challenge you to find a half-full movie theater with only people who actually enjoyed the movie without squirming repeatedly. Soderbergh tried too hard and fell miserably short; Ocean's 12 fails the Ebert test because it fell far short of its goals.
 
2muchcoffeeman said:
Applying the Roger Ebert test, 11 was a towering masterpiece while 12 was a towering failure. Ocean's 11 was precisely the movie it set out to be --- a tightly-scripted piece of entertainment which both the actors and the audience thoroughly enjoyed. Ocean's 12 was badly scripted and I challenge you to find a half-full movie theater with only people who actually enjoyed the movie without squirming repeatedly. Soderbergh tried too hard and fell miserably short; Ocean's 12 fails the Ebert test because it fell far short of its goals.

If O11 was so tightly scripted, explain how the hooker advertisments got down in the vault and back up into the van.
 
Barkin has had so much work done I think she looks more plastic and icky than 53.

I mean, really scary.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top