It'll bend in the coverage preferences and cultural tastes of the major donors
It can work. It'll bend in the coverage preferences and cultural tastes of the major donors - nonprofit media will rarely be for the rank-and-file, rock-n-roll crowd - but it may be a way forward in larger cities.
A large percentage of AP's national coverage this year is subsidized by private foundations.
How is what SLC did different from what St. Pete or Tupelo did? That “first” makes me itch a little.
Sounds like certain radio stations to the left of the FM dial.Easy to spend other people's money.
The federal government paying or subsidizing the press?
Easy to spend other people's money.
The federal government paying or subsidizing the press?
We have more than one of those in our state already, maybe not strictly nonprofit but subsidized to a fare-thee-well. (God help anyone getting their information from the likes of Yellowhammer News.) More subtle but still insidious are “good news” sites like Alabama NewsCenter, which is bankrolled by the monopoly electric company and regards good news as that which pitches commercial and economic development as always positive regardless of any government giveaways needed.Non-profit news is "the answer" until Republicans fully catch on and fund their own non-profit news orgs. Imagine the University of Austin in every other town as a news org.
Imagine the University of Austin in every other town as a news org.