Mrs. Doubtfire sequel in the works

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

MisterCreosote said:
bigpern23 said:
The original was very good, but I can't imagine a scenario with any semblance of believability that would cause Daniel Hilliard to don the dress again.

The first one ended with him starting a new TV show in the Mrs. Doubtfire getup. "The show has been airing for 20 years" is all the believability you need.

I forgot that's how it ended. I suppose that would provide the jumping off point.

Mizzougrad96 said:
According to a couple different web sites, Williams makes $165K and Gellar makes $100K an episode.

That's nothing for a hit show, but it might be a lot for one that is just petering along.

Brad Garrett's probably doesn't come cheap, though he's only in a few episodes. It seemed his role was expanding, but I guess not.

It's really a pretty good show. The cast has chemistry and they play off Williams very well. It's difficult to keep Williams' personality from overwhelming other actors, but the rest of the cast does a good job holding its own, particularly James Wolk, who plays Zach.
 
There have been remakes and reboots, but I wonder what the longest time has been between original and sequel.
 
bigpern23 said:
The original was very good ...

s-ARSENIO-large300.jpg


Sorry. I just hate Mrs. Doubtfire with every fiber of my being.
 
Unless Robin Williams is still on coke, I don't see how he could have blown through all his money.
 
dooley_womack1 said:
Unless Robin Williams is still on coke, I don't see how he could have blown through all his money.

Two divorces. I've heard it cost him $20 million, and it's unclear if that's combined or each.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
MisterCreosote said:
dooley_womack1 said:
Unless Robin Williams is still on coke, I don't see how he could have blown through all his money.

Two divorces. I've heard it cost him $20 million, and it's unclear if that's combined or each.

That sounds ridiculously low, given what he was making awhile back. There was about a 10-year stretch from 1990-2000 where he was in the $10-$20 million group, back when Doubtfire, Jumanji and some of the other crap he did was coming out. I remember reading that he made over $20 million for Bicentennial Man and that bombed so badly, I don't know if he's had a big successful film with him in a lead part since.

I loved Death to Smoochy, but I don't think anyone would call it anything resembling a hit.
 
I've read that the season finale of "The Crazy Ones" had terrible ratings, airing on a night during which CBS' other shows were reruns and that was the final blow.
 
I read something where they said it hadn't officially been canceled yet, but they expect it to be.

The whole "Big name coming back to TV" concept hasn't worked too well with new shows. This one had two bonafide stars and never got much traction, even if it was a pretty good show. The Michael J. Fox Show was a complete bomb, same with that show with the guy from Will and Grace.

Tim Allen has done OK, but Last Man Standing is far from a hit. Patricia Heaton has done pretty well, but that show isn't exactly a hit either, even though it will go into syndication, which is always a pretty impressive feat.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
I read something where they said it hadn't officially been canceled yet, but they expect it to be.

The whole "Big name coming back to TV" concept hasn't worked too well with new shows. This one had two bonafide stars and never got much traction, even if it was a pretty good show. The Michael J. Fox Show was a complete bomb, same with that show with the guy from Will and Grace.

Tim Allen has done OK, but Last Man Standing is far from a hit. Patricia Heaton has done pretty well, but that show isn't exactly a hit either, even though it will go into syndication, which is always a pretty impressive feat.

And Last Man Standing is essentially "Home Improvement 2.0" with the boys replaced by girls and the tool show replaced by a outdoors store.

Just watched the finale of The Crazy Ones last night and I'm definitely disappointed they won't get a second season. Compared to some of the other new comedies, it's light years better. "Friends With Better Lives," for example, is off to a terrible start in my view.
 
Yeah, Last Man Standing is nothing close to as good as Home Improvement, but it's still solid, at least compared to the other **** that's out there.
 
I've watched two episodes of Friends With Better Lives. The first one (which was the pilot) looked promising. The second one was uneven with some good stuff and some stuff that made 2 Broke Girls look like Citizen Kane.
 
apeman33 said:
I've watched two episodes of Friends With Better Lives. The first one (which was the pilot) looked promising. The second one was uneven with some good stuff and some stuff that made 2 Broke Girls look like Citizen Kane.

Yeah, I don't mind when shows push the envelope, but so often, it's just not funny, and with the exception of 2 1/2 Men (a show that's success probably had more to do with having a huge star in the main role, than anything else) when has that formula been successful? Two Broke Girls will make in into syndication and has gotten a fourth season, but nobody is going to mistake it for a hit show. I don't think it's ever been a top 20 show (for the year).
 
All I know of 2 Broke Girls is dirty jokes and boobs. I can get both elsewhere.
 
bigpern23 said:
The original was very good, but I can't imagine a scenario with any semblance of believability that would cause Daniel Hilliard to don the dress again.

Thumbs down.

Was believability a foundational element in the success of the original?
 
Buck said:
bigpern23 said:
The original was very good, but I can't imagine a scenario with any semblance of believability that would cause Daniel Hilliard to don the dress again.

Thumbs down.

Was believability a foundational element in the success of the original?

Yes, actually. I mean, yeah, you have to suspend disbelief but you have to do the same thing to enjoy a movie about a billionaire who dresses like a bat and fights crime. But, the man loved his kids so it's plausible that he'd go to that extreme to spend time with them.

But, even in Hollywood, any possible plot for a sequel just wouldn't make sense.
 
Buck said:
bigpern23 said:
The original was very good, but I can't imagine a scenario with any semblance of believability that would cause Daniel Hilliard to don the dress again.

Thumbs down.

Was believability a foundational element in the success of the original?

I think the success of the original was largely due to people being able to relate to the lengths a dad would go to to be around his kids. It was also Williams at, or near his peak, which certainly didn't hurt.
 
This was the second-highest grossing movie of 1993- a great year for movies.
And Sally Field is the best 60-some•odd-year-old woman I have ever seen.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
That's funny that the daughter from the original is saying she wants nothing to do with the sequel.

I just realized that The Crazy Ones was canceled. It wasn't a great show by any stretch, but I'm surprised it wasn't picked up.

Really? I loved that show.
 
DeskMonkey1 said:
But, even in Hollywood, any possible plot for a sequel just wouldn't make sense.

I don't know, presumably Mrs. Doubtfire (the fictional TV show) scored well with audiences and judging by some of the kids shows that hit it big, Mrs. Doubtfire may have become a national star and become a big celebrity. Enough time has passed that maybe the kids are about to have their own kids or the show is going to be cancelled in favour of some of the other **** that networks put on the air these days. There's probably more to go on than many of the sequels we've been subjected to lately.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top