Monster In Chief

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fenian_Bastard
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

F

Fenian_Bastard

Guest
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/008794.php

They tortured a mentally ill man nearly to death so that Fredo wouldn't look bad. And then the whole coutry went on point because a crazy man babbled so they wouldn't hurt him any more.
Suskind's been right since 2002. It is ALL about domestic politics. Always was.
Jesus wept.
 
Fenian_Bastard said:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/008794.php

They tortured a mentally ill man nearly to death so that Fredo wouldn't look bad. And then the whole coutry went on point because a crazy man babbled so they wouldn't hurt him any more.
Suskind's been right since 2002. It is ALL about domestic politics. Always was.
Jesus wept.

Fenian = ****tard

Anyone knows torture is a very bad way to get reliable information from someone. Real life is not "Alias," domino bowel dancer.
 
I thought this was about that stupid Jane Fonda movie where she's JLo's motherinlaw. Sorry.
 
Whoa nellie, this one's got all the markings of an old-fashioned donnybrook! Hold onto your hats and katie bar the door, here we go!
 
DyePack said:
Fenian_Bastard said:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/008794.php

They tortured a mentally ill man nearly to death so that Fredo wouldn't look bad. And then the whole coutry went on point because a crazy man babbled so they wouldn't hurt him any more.
Suskind's been right since 2002. It is ALL about domestic politics. Always was.
Jesus wept.

Fenian = ****tard

Anyone knows torture is a very bad way to get reliable information from someone. Real life is not "Alias," domino bowel dancer.

Not remotely worthy of reply, even if I spoke Martian, which I don't.
 
DyePack said:
Fenian = ****tard

Why is Fenian the bad guy? He didn't ask for an insane man to be tortured to the point that he gave information that the interrogators wanted to hear. He was just the guy who pointed it out.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
JRoyal said:
DyePack said:
Fenian = ****tard

Why is Fenian the bad guy? He didn't ask for an insane man to be tortured to the point that he gave information that the interrogators wanted to hear. He was just the guy who pointed it out.

Because, JR, dontcha know that Bush is the Greatest Hero in the world.

bush_hero_flight_suit.jpg
 
Oh, and Fenian takes the high road! But he still manages a dig at DyePack's communication skills with the Martian reference. Wonder how ol' DP is going to respond to this one?
 
spaceman said:
Oh, and Fenian takes the high road! But he still manages a dig at DyePack's communication skills with the Martian reference. Wonder how ol' DP is going to respond to this one?

Forgive Dyepack. The story about the certifiably insane, multiple-personality looney toon hit a little close to home.
 
If Bush's chief concern is losing face, someone should tell him that cow is already out of the barn.
 
I'm also reasonably sure Fenian didn't murder 2,500 U.S. soldiers, either.

Because, at the end of the day, that's what we're talking about here.
 
sportschick said:
JRoyal said:
DyePack said:
Fenian = ****tard

Why is Fenian the bad guy? He didn't ask for an insane man to be tortured to the point that he gave information that the interrogators wanted to hear. He was just the guy who pointed it out.

Because, JR, dontcha know that Bush is the Greatest Hero in the world.

bush_hero_flight_suit.jpg
Hey, there's only one JR here! :)
 
Also reviewed yesterday in the uber liberal New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/20/books/20kaku.html

Mr. Suskind writes that the war on terror gave the president and vice president "vast, creative prerogatives": "to do what they want, when they want to, for whatever reason they decide" and to "create whatever reality was convenient."

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm....
 
JR said:
Also reviewed yesterday in the uber liberal New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/20/books/20kaku.html

Mr. Suskind writes that the war on terror gave the president and vice president "vast, creative prerogatives": "to do what they want, when they want to, for whatever reason they decide" and to "create whatever reality was convenient."

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm....

Why must young Americans, born into a land exultant with hope and with golden promise, toil and suffer and sometimes die in such a remote and distant place?

The answer, like the war itself, is not an easy one, but it echoes clearly from the painful lessons of half a century. Three times in my lifetime, in two World Wars and in Korea, Americans have gone to far lands to fight for freedom. We have learned at a terrible and a brutal cost that retreat does not bring safety and weakness does not bring peace.

It is this lesson that has brought us to Viet-Nam. This is a different kind of war. There are no marching armies or solemn declarations. Some citizens of South Viet-Nam at times, with understandable grievances, have joined in the attack on their own government.

But we must not let this mask the central fact that this is really war. It is guided by North Viet-Nam and it is spurred by Communist China. Its goal is to conquer the South, to defeat American power, and to extend the Asiatic dominion of communism.


LBJ
 
That Asiatic dominion of communism is really working, isn't it?
 
Anyone catch Frontline last night? It's the most damning documentary yet of our invasion for oil. It'll be re-run tonight, or Thursday at 2 a.m. The CIA has its say, finally.
 
More Suskind.

http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2006/06/20/911pdb/index.html

Dumbass.
 
Boom, as usual, manages an unattributed, irrelevant quote.

Good work, Sparky.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top