Man bites dawg

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Just the facts ma am

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2012
Messages
1,346
I'll riff a bit.

The two black shooters will never see the light of day again (appropriately).

The white getaway driver on bail not only goes back to school, he went to the World Series. Student attends Dodgers game after being charged in man's death

Am I the only one who read "Cameron Terrell" and thought, "uh-oh this is a wealthy black family" ? (I am black)

Was the rap video, filmed at the Palos Verdes home?
 
If a Blood was the target of the hit, then the thread title still applies.
From all reports an innocent neighborhood black man with no gang affiliation was murdered for no reason. You know, terrorism.

The reported killers propaganda espoused violent local neighborhood patriotism and blind allegiance to their cult at the risk of death. They proudly displayed their symbols of loyalty, their appreciation and admiration of their second amendment rights and their cultural appreciation for their women folk.
 
I know what ****ing “dawg” means.
Sorry, I put you in the wrong reply. This is for you.

The phrase man bites dog is a shortened version of an aphorism in journalism which describes how an unusual, infrequent event (such as a man biting a dog) is more likely to be reported as news than an ordinary, everyday occurrence with similar consequences, such as a dog biting a man. An event is usually considered more newsworthy if there is something unusual about it; a commonplace event is less likely to be seen as newsworthy, even if the consequences of both events have objectively similar outcomes. The result is that rarer events more often appear as news stories, while more common events appear less often, thus distorting the perceptions of news consumers of what constitutes normal rates of occurrence.
 
tenor.gif


The officers are still wondering who is Me Dawg.
 
Sorry, I put you in the wrong reply. This is for you.

The phrase man bites dog is a shortened version of an aphorism in journalism which describes how an unusual, infrequent event (such as a man biting a dog) is more likely to be reported as news than an ordinary, everyday occurrence with similar consequences, such as a dog biting a man. An event is usually considered more newsworthy if there is something unusual about it; a commonplace event is less likely to be seen as newsworthy, even if the consequences of both events have objectively similar outcomes. The result is that rarer events more often appear as news stories, while more common events appear less often, thus distorting the perceptions of news consumers of what constitutes normal rates of occurrence.

I was just trying to troll you into saying something racist, dawg.

This has gone on long enough.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top