Steak Snabler
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2005
- Messages
- 24,628
The ballot was released today. Lots of intriguing first-timers and holdovers.
Hall of Famers announced Jan. 8.
Hall of Famers announced Jan. 8.
Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
My dividing line on cheaters:**** Whitman said:Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
It is when you exclude cheaters.
i will adopt your opinion.Michael_ Gee said:****, I've stated my policy here before. If the Hall, which MLB controls, wants to kick guys off the ballot for drug use, that's fine. But I won't do Selig's dirty work for him. If players are on the ballot, I will consider them as players, period.
**** Whitman said:Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
It is when you exclude cheaters.
heyabbott said:My dividing line on cheaters:**** Whitman said:Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
It is when you exclude cheaters.
If the player's primary motivation to cheat was to recover from injury or extend his career I'm not letting it get in the way of believing they are HOFers, Bonds and Clemens.
But if they cheated to become better players than they naturally could be, they are not HOFers, Palmeiro, McGwire and Sosa.
outofplace said:**** Whitman said:Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
It is when you exclude cheaters.
Who on that list has been proven to be a cheater? Not suspected, but proven.
outofplace said:**** Whitman said:Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
It is when you exclude cheaters.
Who on that list has been proven to be a cheater? Not suspected, but proven.
**** Whitman said:outofplace said:**** Whitman said:Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
It is when you exclude cheaters.
Who on that list has been proven to be a cheater? Not suspected, but proven.
Palmeiro, McGwire, and Sosa, right? Bonds for the most part. He as much as admitted using in his GJ testimony - just said he didn't know what it was. Not sure if intent is required for conviction here or not, though.
**** Whitman said:outofplace said:**** Whitman said:Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
It is when you exclude cheaters.
Who on that list has been proven to be a cheater? Not suspected, but proven.
Palmeiro, McGwire, and Sosa, right? Bonds for the most part. He as much as admitted using in his GJ testimony - just said he didn't know what it was. Not sure if intent is required for conviction here or not, though.
heyabbott said:My dividing line on cheaters:**** Whitman said:Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
It is when you exclude cheaters.
If the player's primary motivation to cheat was to recover from injury or extend his career I'm not letting it get in the way of believing they are HOFers, Bonds and Clemens.
But if they cheated to become better players than they naturally could be, they are not HOFers, Palmeiro, McGwire and Sosa.
outofplace said:**** Whitman said:outofplace said:**** Whitman said:Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
It is when you exclude cheaters.
Who on that list has been proven to be a cheater? Not suspected, but proven.
Palmeiro, McGwire, and Sosa, right? Bonds for the most part. He as much as admitted using in his GJ testimony - just said he didn't know what it was. Not sure if intent is required for conviction here or not, though.
I see those as reasonable, but to be honest, I'd want either a confession or a failed drug test to keep a guy out. Otherwise, it becomes more and more subjective how much guesswork you are doing.
outofplace said:**** Whitman said:outofplace said:**** Whitman said:Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
It is when you exclude cheaters.
Who on that list has been proven to be a cheater? Not suspected, but proven.
Palmeiro, McGwire, and Sosa, right? Bonds for the most part. He as much as admitted using in his GJ testimony - just said he didn't know what it was. Not sure if intent is required for conviction here or not, though.
I see those as reasonable, but to be honest, I'd want either a confession or a failed drug test to keep a guy out. Otherwise, it becomes more and more subjective how much guesswork you are doing.
nmmetsfan said:outofplace said:**** Whitman said:outofplace said:**** Whitman said:Michael_ Gee said:Not too hard to find the maximum 10 votes on that list.
It is when you exclude cheaters.
Who on that list has been proven to be a cheater? Not suspected, but proven.
Palmeiro, McGwire, and Sosa, right? Bonds for the most part. He as much as admitted using in his GJ testimony - just said he didn't know what it was. Not sure if intent is required for conviction here or not, though.
I see those as reasonable, but to be honest, I'd want either a confession or a failed drug test to keep a guy out. Otherwise, it becomes more and more subjective how much guesswork you are doing.
I think your stance is reasonable. I also think it's reasonable for voters to keep a guy out based on circumstantial evidence. A vote is always going to be subjective, otherwise there'd be hard guidelines to follow.