The Big Ragu
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2002
- Messages
- 30,281
http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2012/05/04/was-amazons-kindle-fire-just-a-flash-in-the-pan/
Shipments fell from 4.8 million in Christmas quarter to less than 750,000 units last quarter, according to link above.
From something I read on Seeking Alpha, that took them from 17 percent of the tablet market in Q4 2011 to just 4 percent in Q1 2012. That other piece also argued (based on what a supplier of the e-Ink screens for the basic Kindle units told him--Amazon is not buying any) that with the Kindle Fire, Amazon basically killed its basic Kindle market, where it may not be selling much of anything. If he's right, Amazon's attempt to eat into Apple and Google's dominance bit the dust VERY quickly, and they may are probably not the player they were in the eReader market before they introduced the Fire.
For what it is worth, I like my Kindle Fire. I use it most as just an eReader for books, and read a lot on it now, with an occasional app and some basic web browsing thrown in when it's the closest thing to grab. When I bought it, though, my thinking was that I wanted an eReader smaller than the iPad, and if I was going to get one, I might as well spend the bit extra and get the one with basic tablet capabilities. I am wondering how many people bought it thinking it was more than what it is, and if so, if that is just not enough now with the crossover between devices?
Shipments fell from 4.8 million in Christmas quarter to less than 750,000 units last quarter, according to link above.
From something I read on Seeking Alpha, that took them from 17 percent of the tablet market in Q4 2011 to just 4 percent in Q1 2012. That other piece also argued (based on what a supplier of the e-Ink screens for the basic Kindle units told him--Amazon is not buying any) that with the Kindle Fire, Amazon basically killed its basic Kindle market, where it may not be selling much of anything. If he's right, Amazon's attempt to eat into Apple and Google's dominance bit the dust VERY quickly, and they may are probably not the player they were in the eReader market before they introduced the Fire.
For what it is worth, I like my Kindle Fire. I use it most as just an eReader for books, and read a lot on it now, with an occasional app and some basic web browsing thrown in when it's the closest thing to grab. When I bought it, though, my thinking was that I wanted an eReader smaller than the iPad, and if I was going to get one, I might as well spend the bit extra and get the one with basic tablet capabilities. I am wondering how many people bought it thinking it was more than what it is, and if so, if that is just not enough now with the crossover between devices?