Justifying your existance...

[doubledown68]

Unfortunately layoffs are nothing new in this business. I've been lucky enough thus far to avoid a major bloodletting, but it appears that luck is going to run out.

We were told on Thursday that our efficiency will be examined over the coming week. (The Bobs from Office Space, etc.)

So for the next week we've got to document our day: how much time we spent doing this, how much time we spent doing that, how many bylines, briefs, calls, posts, yada, yada.

The ****ing cool part -- besides how insulting it is -- is that no standards were given. Do they want more bylines? More web posts? Who the **** knows?

So we do this for a week, and then in two months, supposedly, they'll come in with axes and start swinging.

As for me? I think they already have a great idea who they'll let go. I don't know if I'm safe or not, but I think all this is ham-handed justification for decisions they've already made.

So I'll justify my existence by doing my job, just as I have since they hired me. But frankly I wish they'd just have the balls to do what they're going to do anyway.

 

[rpmmutant]

Unfortunately your paper is looking for reasons to fire people. If workers cut their own throats, it makes management's job even easier. If you value your job, play along. I say even exaggerate what you do. If you talk to parents after a practice or a game, write down you maintain a positive and productive presence in the community for the newspaper. Fight BS with BS.

 

[MonsterLobster]

The bad thing about this is everyone is going to inflate what they do all week and put in more hours than they have all year, which for all I know is already more than the 40 they're probably paid for. When that happens, how can you even expect these things to be reliable?

 

[flexmaster33]

yes, what a silly exercise, and I'm sure the company is paying these "consultants" to come analyze everyone's job performance...something the higher-ups are more qualified to do and should be doing anyway.

 

[TheHacker]

Hey doubledown, going through this exercise -- which I agree is insulting -- is actually to your advantage at this time of year. You're busy as all hell getting your football tab ready, doing previews of other fall sports, trying to get info out to coaches and ADs about how to report results to the paper, etc. If they did this to you in June or July your day certainly wouldn't look as busy as it does right now. I agree with rpmmutant -- detail everything you do that is a part of preseason preparations, no matter how small it is.

But I agree these sorts of things make you want to do anything but work. We go through this every time someone leaves and the paper makes a decision about whether to fill the job or not. How many bylines did the departing person have each week, what was our inch count, etc. It's just flat-out demoralizing. But management doesn't give a crap about that. Such is the state of our business.

 

[Uncle.Ruckus]

Sounds like The Bobs from Office Space. Sorry, man. Good luck.

 

[joe_schmoe]

They did something like this at our office a few months ago. The result was they got rid of the night (police) reporter and changed it to a day shift with more feature reports.
When something major happens after 6:30, our newsroom is completely useless. Really keeping newspapers relevant.

 

[webo]

Corporate nonsense. (FYI: If you do use the word existence in the process of justifying your existence, make sure you spell it right.)

 

[doubledown68]

Corporate nonsense. (FYI: If you do use the word existence in the process of justifying your existence, make sure you spell it right.)

Gotcha, chief. This week was busy for me regardless. And I'll play the game. But like I said, I think decisions have already been made.... nobody who they're looking to eliminate is going to have their job, short of winning a Pulitzer.

 

[bumpy mcgee]

They did this at my wife's paper about two months ago. They had everyone document what they did for two weeks.
Unfortunately, we took a vacation one of those weeks. One week after we got back to town, my wife was let go.
The ****tier thing is one of my wife's friends was in the hospital one of the weeks with her sick son. She too was let go in the same round of lay-offs.

 

[WriteThinking]

As you've said, the decisions have probably already been made, pretty much. Given that, there likely isn't much you can do to save, or to not have to save, yourself at this point. Inflating hours, or work, artificially or temporarily, just for looks and just for now, probably shouldn't be done, either, because then that might be used against you.

When it comes to those things, companies really do prefer that you work smarter, not harder, and not just as a new, wholly uncreative mantra but as a basic tenet of business success. It really does make sense, in the all-important economic/bottom-line way that is critical to any business.

Just do your job to the best of your ability. That's really all you can do -- ever. Beyond that, this type of decision is out of your hands.

 

[SF_Express]

I'm 55, and I've been accused of being too nice about evaluating people throughout my life, and it's just finally sinking in how many stupid people there are in this business. Stupid, misguided, hard-headed (the wrong way), ignorant ... grab a thesaurus and fill in your own adjectives.

 

[Baron Scicluna]

I had to do this at my former Gannett paper. I filled out with every little thing I did, describing it all.

Did it help? Beats the heck out of me. If I remember right, I survived one layoff group before getting the ax.

 

[podunk press]

The thing that really amuses me about stunts like this is, shouldn't management already know who is delivering and who isn't?

 

[PaperDoll]

Re: Justifying your existence...

Meanwhile, Gannett admitted it's essentially throwing darts at a list of names. Corporate put out a memo before the last round of layoffs saying that job performance had nothing to do with whether someone would be retained.

http://gannettblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/urgent-gannett-announces-700-newspaper.html

 

[Brad Guire]

I don't think there's a right answer. If they're going to slit your throat, it'll happen no matter what you do.

 

[Baron Scicluna]

Meanwhile, Gannett admitted it's essentially throwing darts at a list of names. Corporate put out a memo before the last round of layoffs saying that job performance had nothing to do with whether someone would be retained.

http://gannettblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/urgent-gannett-announces-700-newspaper.html

To which every employee should essentially do the bare minimum then. They're gonig to lay you off anyways? Why kill yourself for a company that doesn't give a **** about you?

 

[JakeandElwood]

And of course the fine folks who preside over this whole mess and got millions in bonuses won't have to justify ****. Hell, someone probably got a nice check just for coming up with this brilliant idea.

 

[flexmaster33]

Yes wouldn't that be great...the outsiders come in and recommend no more bonuses for the big boys as the No. 1 cost-cutting measure

 

[Batman]

They did something like this at our office a few months ago. The result was they got rid of the night (police) reporter and changed it to a day shift with more feature reports.
When something major happens after 6:30, our newsroom is completely useless. Really keeping newspapers relevant.

Surely, criminals would be considerate enough to schedule their robbing and murdering during business hours.