Rules are rules. Follow them or suffer the consequences.
Ok. Then punish the offender.Rules are rules. Follow them or suffer the consequences.
You'd be surprised. For RI courts, you needed special permission ahead of time to take any photos or video, or record things. I think they were partially paranoid that the recording devices would pick up the "private" conferences they had at the bench. In which case, I'd say that they should instead hold the item in chambers. But there are still a ton of ornamental and procedural things - pomp and circumstance - that make court more annoying than it has to be.You have to credit the editor for taking it, himself, for his reporter. It's nice to see the back-up. I feel like that's not necessarily a sure thing to have happen anymore.
And, why would a judge prohibit recording devices, especially audio ones, at least? It seems to me that'd be a contributing factor in accuracy of what gets reported. Who wouldn't want that?
I'll defer to someone like Tarheel316, but in my experience, the Rockingham/Southern Pines part of the state is full of good 'ol boys who are proud of the county's football team and their generations of white privilege, and put up with the golfers who just happen to help pay taxes at Pinehurst.
Reading the piece, it appears Futrell had a previous hissy with the ME over a photo, and was looking for an excuse to pick a fight with the paper. Why else would he be paying attention to the reporter instead of the murder case he's supposedly presiding over?
If Richmond County's anything like most North Carolina towns, Futrell's getting pats on the back this week at the local BBQ joint and his barber for "sticking it to the media." But he's now put himself in an undefensible position. Does he really think the appelate judge will back his BS knee-jerk jerkiness with a 30-day jail stay? I can't imagine the state supremes in Raleigh will like the embarrassment this ass brings to their judicial system, either.
The saving grace for the ME and the reporter is they probably won't stay in Rockingham long, especially when "spent a night in jail for standing up to a judge" goes to the top of the resume. But Futrell is never leaving that small town. That's a much worse punishment than wearing an orange jumpsuit.
Unfortunately, by the time the appeal makes it right he will have spent a day in a jail and they will have to have shelled out money for an attorney. It's BS.
This is a perfect example of why I feel judges have too much power. That judge gets to be a local dictator. And like you say look at the cost involved trying to fend him off. Not fair at all.So disagree.
That judge sounds out of control.
He has the discretion to allow recording in his court room, so he could have simply done nothing. Or he could have told the reporter to stop recording, he even could have pulled the reporter into chambers and yelled at him and threatened to find him in contempt if he does it again.
What he did smacked of an ass on a power trip. It kind of demonstrates why judges shouldn't have that kind of power to jail people without due process.
The editor was sentenced to 5 days in jail for something he didn't even do. ... without any due process and without benefit of an attorney. He wasn't the one recording, yet he got jailed on a direct contempt charge when he wasn't the one causing the "disburbance" in the courtroom.
Unfortunately, by the time the appeal makes it right he will have spent a day in a jail and they will have to have shelled out money for an attorney. It's BS.
"The newspaper stopped covering the murder trial once Stone was taken into custody, partially out of fear the judge would retaliate. It has not reported on Stone's arrest or Sasser's fine."
This is where you double down.
I'll defer to someone like Tarheel316, but in my experience, the Rockingham/Southern Pines part of the state is full of good 'ol boys who are proud of the county's football team and their generations of white privilege, and put up with the golfers who just happen to help pay taxes at Pinehurst.
Reading the piece, it appears Futrell had a previous hissy with the ME over a photo, and was looking for an excuse to pick a fight with the paper. Why else would he be paying attention to the reporter instead of the murder case he's supposedly presiding over?
If Richmond County's anything like most North Carolina towns, Futrell's getting pats on the back this week at the local BBQ joint and his barber for "sticking it to the media." But he's now put himself in an undefensible position. Does he really think the appelate judge will back his BS knee-jerk jerkiness with a 30-day jail stay? I can't imagine the state supremes in Raleigh will like the embarrassment this ass brings to their judicial system, either.
The saving grace for the ME and the reporter is they probably won't stay in Rockingham long, especially when "spent a night in jail for standing up to a judge" goes to the top of the resume. But Futrell is never leaving that small town. That's a much worse punishment than wearing an orange jumpsuit.
I would hate to have a vehicle breakdown in Robeson County.That whole area is, uhhhh, unique: Anson County, Richmond County, Robeson County. I was through there the other day and saw a nice vehicle that had been left sitting along 74. It was on chunks of wood all four wheels missing*
*stolen
I would hate to have a vehicle breakdown in Robeson County.
I would hate to have a vehicle breakdown in Robeson County.
For nearly four years, I would go from a place where I worked in South Carolina to my hometown during the occasional time off.
Believe me when I say that I always knew how much gas my vehicle had between here and there. Stopping in Robeson County is NOT an option. Period.