It's HOF time again...

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

buckweaver said:
sgreenwell said:
I'm naturally a Red Sox fan, so it's a bit hard for me to stick up for A-Rod, but there is value in his numbers even if you assume he's never, ever delivered in the clutch. Winning an extra seven to 12 games during the season is worth $X million, even if he hits .100 during the playoffs.

Far be it from me to stick up for A-Rod -- because I certainly did enjoy bashing him when that was good sport -- but that would be a pretty stupid assumption to make.

For what it's worth, he's actually hit .279 in the playoffs. Below his career regular-season numbers, for sure, but hardly a team-killer.

As I said before, I don't think people allow much room for their perceptions to change. "Even if you assume A-Rod has never, ever delivered in the clutch" is fun for a Red Sox fan to believe -- and nobody gives a **** that it's not true. Print the legend, etc.

Believe it or not, accuracy can be fun to believe, too.

Listen, everyone knows A-Rod collapses in the clutch. He's not a real winner like Luis Sojo or Dickey Simpkins or Bill Wennington.
 
dooley_womack1 said:
Zeke12 said:
Drip said:
spnited said:
Drip and Simon "debating" .... pass the popcorn, please.
No debating here. I have a vote and I know which players I think deserve to be in the Hall. End of argument.

Oh, please.

I retract my previous statements indicating implicit faith in the electors.
LOL. Jealousy and flattery by Dools. Gotta love it.
 
shotglass said:
Evil ******* (aka Chris_L) said:
An old Boston saying went - Imagine Don Sweeney's heart in Bob Sweeney's body (sorry for the NHL reference).

Imagine Dustin Pedroia's heart in A-Rod's body?

Hoo boy. This kid's going to get lionized well before his time, I can see.

At least Pedroia has done more in his career be far more deserving of such lionization than the previous little-white-guy-with-a-heart-of-ginormous-balls, David Eckstein.
 
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iTeQPe1iupXmLnATNRQV86-gPSGwD94SQEPG0

I put this one on the Hot Stove thread, too, but it does relate to one of the conversations here as well. Greg Maddux will announce his retirement Monday. No big surprised.

It also won't be a surprise, but it will suck, when a few Hall of Fame voters will actually leave Maddux off their ballots five years from now.
 
outofplace said:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iTeQPe1iupXmLnATNRQV86-gPSGwD94SQEPG0

I put this one on the Hot Stove thread, too, but it does relate to one of the conversations here as well. Greg Maddux will announce his retirement Monday. No big surprised.

It also won't be a surprise, but it will suck, when a few Hall of Fame voters will actually leave Maddux off their ballots five years from now.
No baseball player will ever hold the title of GOAT
 
What about Jim Kaat, The left-hander holds a lifetime record of 283-237 with a 3.45 ERA. Over that span, he had three 20-win seasons, which included a career-high 25 victories for Minnesota in 1966. That was the year that Kaat threw 19 complete games and three shutouts, posted a 2.75 ERA and had just 55 walks in more than 300 innings. http://newyork.yankees.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20081126&content_id=3694381&vkey=news_nyy&fext=.jsp&c_id=nyy
 
Drip said:
outofplace said:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iTeQPe1iupXmLnATNRQV86-gPSGwD94SQEPG0

I put this one on the Hot Stove thread, too, but it does relate to one of the conversations here as well. Greg Maddux will announce his retirement Monday. No big surprised.

It also won't be a surprise, but it will suck, when a few Hall of Fame voters will actually leave Maddux off their ballots five years from now.
No baseball player will ever hold the title of GOAT
http://goatmaiden.blogspot.com/2008/03/first-inductees-to-goat-hall-o-fame.html
 
Simon_Cowbell said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iTeQPe1iupXmLnATNRQV86-gPSGwD94SQEPG0

I put this one on the Hot Stove thread, too, but it does relate to one of the conversations here as well. Greg Maddux will announce his retirement Monday. No big surprised.

It also won't be a surprise, but it will suck, when a few Hall of Fame voters will actually leave Maddux off their ballots five years from now.
No baseball player will ever hold the title of GOAT
http://goatmaiden.blogspot.com/2008/03/first-inductees-to-goat-hall-o-fame.html
Simon, GOAT is Greatest Of All Time.
 
Drip said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iTeQPe1iupXmLnATNRQV86-gPSGwD94SQEPG0

I put this one on the Hot Stove thread, too, but it does relate to one of the conversations here as well. Greg Maddux will announce his retirement Monday. No big surprised.

It also won't be a surprise, but it will suck, when a few Hall of Fame voters will actually leave Maddux off their ballots five years from now.
No baseball player will ever hold the title of GOAT
http://goatmaiden.blogspot.com/2008/03/first-inductees-to-goat-hall-o-fame.html
Simon, GOAT is Greatest Of All Time.

Yeah, it's much better to have voters turning in fraudulent ballots. ::)
 
outofplace said:
Drip said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iTeQPe1iupXmLnATNRQV86-gPSGwD94SQEPG0

I put this one on the Hot Stove thread, too, but it does relate to one of the conversations here as well. Greg Maddux will announce his retirement Monday. No big surprised.

It also won't be a surprise, but it will suck, when a few Hall of Fame voters will actually leave Maddux off their ballots five years from now.
No baseball player will ever hold the title of GOAT
http://goatmaiden.blogspot.com/2008/03/first-inductees-to-goat-hall-o-fame.html
Simon, GOAT is Greatest Of All Time.

Yeah, it's much better to have voters turning in fraudulent ballots. ::)
?
 
Drip said:
outofplace said:
Drip said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iTeQPe1iupXmLnATNRQV86-gPSGwD94SQEPG0

I put this one on the Hot Stove thread, too, but it does relate to one of the conversations here as well. Greg Maddux will announce his retirement Monday. No big surprised.

It also won't be a surprise, but it will suck, when a few Hall of Fame voters will actually leave Maddux off their ballots five years from now.
No baseball player will ever hold the title of GOAT
http://goatmaiden.blogspot.com/2008/03/first-inductees-to-goat-hall-o-fame.html
Simon, GOAT is Greatest Of All Time.

Yeah, it's much better to have voters turning in fraudulent ballots. ::)
?

As I mentioned earlier in the thread, if the ballot leaves off a player the writer knows deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, I believe it is a fraudulent ballot. Any ballot without Henderson this year is fraudulent. The same will be true of any ballot without Maddux in his first year of eligibility. They are no-brainers. I don't see how you can make any coherent argument against either guy, except this need to make sure nobody goes in unanimously.

To me, that is a manipulation rather than honest voting.
 
outofplace said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
Drip said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iTeQPe1iupXmLnATNRQV86-gPSGwD94SQEPG0

I put this one on the Hot Stove thread, too, but it does relate to one of the conversations here as well. Greg Maddux will announce his retirement Monday. No big surprised.

It also won't be a surprise, but it will suck, when a few Hall of Fame voters will actually leave Maddux off their ballots five years from now.
No baseball player will ever hold the title of GOAT
http://goatmaiden.blogspot.com/2008/03/first-inductees-to-goat-hall-o-fame.html
Simon, GOAT is Greatest Of All Time.

Yeah, it's much better to have voters turning in fraudulent ballots. ::)
?

As I mentioned earlier in the thread, if the ballot leaves off a player the writer knows deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, I believe it is a fraudulent ballot. Any ballot without Henderson this year is fraudulent. The same will be true of any ballot without Maddux in his first year of eligibility. They are no-brainers. I don't see how you can make any coherent argument against either guy, except this need to make sure nobody goes in unanimously.

To me, that is a manipulation rather than honest voting.
I agree. But remember, Jesus had 12 Disciples. 11 went with him. One went against him. And they were all hand-picked. If you can't follow Jesus, how can you expect anything else to be unanimous?
Hank Aaron and Willie Mays and Babe Ruth weren't unaimous.....
 
Drip said:
outofplace said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
Drip said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iTeQPe1iupXmLnATNRQV86-gPSGwD94SQEPG0

I put this one on the Hot Stove thread, too, but it does relate to one of the conversations here as well. Greg Maddux will announce his retirement Monday. No big surprised.

It also won't be a surprise, but it will suck, when a few Hall of Fame voters will actually leave Maddux off their ballots five years from now.
No baseball player will ever hold the title of GOAT
http://goatmaiden.blogspot.com/2008/03/first-inductees-to-goat-hall-o-fame.html
Simon, GOAT is Greatest Of All Time.

Yeah, it's much better to have voters turning in fraudulent ballots. ::)
?

As I mentioned earlier in the thread, if the ballot leaves off a player the writer knows deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, I believe it is a fraudulent ballot. Any ballot without Henderson this year is fraudulent. The same will be true of any ballot without Maddux in his first year of eligibility. They are no-brainers. I don't see how you can make any coherent argument against either guy, except this need to make sure nobody goes in unanimously.

To me, that is a manipulation rather than honest voting.
I agree. But remember, Jesus had 12 Disciples. 11 went with him. One went against him. And they were all hand-picked. If you can't follow Jesus, how can you expect anything else to be unanimous?
Hank Aaron and Willie Mays and Babe Ruth weren't unaimous.....

But they should have been. Bad votes in the past don't justify bad votes in the future.
 
outofplace said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
Drip said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iTeQPe1iupXmLnATNRQV86-gPSGwD94SQEPG0

I put this one on the Hot Stove thread, too, but it does relate to one of the conversations here as well. Greg Maddux will announce his retirement Monday. No big surprised.

It also won't be a surprise, but it will suck, when a few Hall of Fame voters will actually leave Maddux off their ballots five years from now.
No baseball player will ever hold the title of GOAT
http://goatmaiden.blogspot.com/2008/03/first-inductees-to-goat-hall-o-fame.html
Simon, GOAT is Greatest Of All Time.

Yeah, it's much better to have voters turning in fraudulent ballots. ::)
?

As I mentioned earlier in the thread, if the ballot leaves off a player the writer knows deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, I believe it is a fraudulent ballot. Any ballot without Henderson this year is fraudulent. The same will be true of any ballot without Maddux in his first year of eligibility. They are no-brainers. I don't see how you can make any coherent argument against either guy, except this need to make sure nobody goes in unanimously.

To me, that is a manipulation rather than honest voting.
I agree. But remember, Jesus had 12 Disciples. 11 went with him. One went against him. And they were all hand-picked. If you can't follow Jesus, how can you expect anything else to be unanimous?
Hank Aaron and Willie Mays and Babe Ruth weren't unaimous.....

But they should have been. Bad votes in the past don't justify bad votes in the future.
I know but that's the way some voters feel.
 
Drip said:
outofplace said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
Drip said:
Simon_Cowbell said:
Drip said:
outofplace said:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iTeQPe1iupXmLnATNRQV86-gPSGwD94SQEPG0

I put this one on the Hot Stove thread, too, but it does relate to one of the conversations here as well. Greg Maddux will announce his retirement Monday. No big surprised.

It also won't be a surprise, but it will suck, when a few Hall of Fame voters will actually leave Maddux off their ballots five years from now.
No baseball player will ever hold the title of GOAT
http://goatmaiden.blogspot.com/2008/03/first-inductees-to-goat-hall-o-fame.html
Simon, GOAT is Greatest Of All Time.

Yeah, it's much better to have voters turning in fraudulent ballots. ::)
?

As I mentioned earlier in the thread, if the ballot leaves off a player the writer knows deserves to be in the Hall of Fame, I believe it is a fraudulent ballot. Any ballot without Henderson this year is fraudulent. The same will be true of any ballot without Maddux in his first year of eligibility. They are no-brainers. I don't see how you can make any coherent argument against either guy, except this need to make sure nobody goes in unanimously.

To me, that is a manipulation rather than honest voting.
I agree. But remember, Jesus had 12 Disciples. 11 went with him. One went against him. And they were all hand-picked. If you can't follow Jesus, how can you expect anything else to be unanimous?
Hank Aaron and Willie Mays and Babe Ruth weren't unaimous.....

But they should have been. Bad votes in the past don't justify bad votes in the future.
I know but that's the way some voters feel.

I know it, and I know it isn't going to change. That doesn't mean I can't disagree with them.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top