It keeps getting worse

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

boots

New Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2005
Messages
9,695
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The San Francisco Chronicle newspaper plans to cut about a quarter of its newsroom staff.
Management told union leaders Thursday that it plans to eliminate 80 union and 20 management positions, out of a newsroom staff of about 400.
Managers told the union the cuts were necessary because of the paper’s continuing financial losses, Michael Cabanatuan, president of the Northern California Media Workers Guild, said in a prepared statement. The Chronicle published a brief news story about the staff reduction Friday.
The guild has proposed a plan to achieve the target number of job reductions through voluntary buyouts and retirement incentives, which management is considering, Cabanatuan said.
In an e-mail distributed by the union to its members, the guild said management could make “involuntary reductions” if 80 cuts could not be made through the buyout and retirement incentives within 30 days.
Two spokesmen for the newspaper did not return phone calls seeking comment Friday.
Chronicle Publisher Frank Vega was quoted in the newspaper’s story saying: “Representatives from the Chronicle did meet (Thursday) with guild representatives to initiate discussions on early retirement and buyout programs involving a significant number of people. We are not prepared to discuss specifics because it was just a preliminary conversation.”
 
Didn't San Fran go from a two-paper town to a one-paper town within the past decade? And now they are cutting more jobs?

This is just getting scary.
 
Wasn't there also the Examiner at one point? Is that still around or was it in a different city? I seem to remember something about two papers folding into one in recent history in San Fran.
 
There was a merger a few years back. Hearst gave the Exminer away, bought the Chron and promised jobs to just about everyone in the building. The Ex was bought by trillionaire Phi Anchutz, who made it into a 6-day-a-week free tabloid. He also started the Washington and Baltimore Examiners. This is the second round of buyouts in the last few years.
The new Ex covers local City news and prep sports.
 
At this rate, all newspapers in the country will be out of business by the end of the decade. Here's hoping the bleeding stops soon.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
In a race to the bottom you've got to put your money on Singleton. And hey, its not so bad - most of these cutbacks are merely a dog-and-pony show in order to clear out top-of-the-pay-tier veterans in their 50s and 60s so they can hire younger, cheaper and healthier staffers.
Remember that report a few years ago that found newspaper quality wasn't a factor in whether someone read a newspaper or not. Could you imagine if it found the opposite was true?
 
DanOregon said:
In a race to the bottom you've got to put your money on Singleton. And hey, its not so bad - most of these cutbacks are merely a dog-and-pony show in order to clear out top-of-the-pay-tier veterans in their 50s and 60s so they can hire younger, cheaper and healthier staffers.
Remember that report a few years ago that found newspaper quality wasn't a factor in whether someone read a newspaper or not. Could you imagine if it found the opposite was true?

i think our definition of quality and readers' definition of quality are two different animals. one of our desk guys forgot to run a late baseball box a week ago, and i got the call from a pist off reader pointing out the fact that "all of you down there" pretty much are idiots. somehow, i think readers care.
 
A core group of readers cares intensely. However, that group is shrinking, and newspapers haven't come up with a good way to sell that group to advertisers. (Although it's possible that "45-64 Male Who Keeps Track of the Box Scores" is not on the list of key demographics.)

Things are changing, sure. But executives are doing a very poor job of riding it out and trying to move with the changes. They're rearranging deck chairs. The thing that will kill newspapers is not the changing habits of the reader; it's the knee-jerk reaction to self-preservation on the part of executives. Scary, really, because these are supposed to be smart people, and you'd think they'd know better.
 
FileNotFound said:
A core group of readers cares intensely. However, that group is shrinking, and newspapers haven't come up with a good way to sell that group to advertisers. (Although it's possible that "45-64 Male Who Keeps Track of the Box Scores" is not on the list of key demographics.)

Things are changing, sure. But executives are doing a very poor job of riding it out and trying to move with the changes. They're rearranging deck chairs. The thing that will kill newspapers is not the changing habits of the reader; it's the knee-jerk reaction to self-preservation on the part of executives. Scary, really, because these are supposed to be smart people, and you'd think they'd know better.

i gave one example of many. you cannot bastardize quality and expect to sell your product to more people. quality has been cut ... see cuts in newsroom staff.

do you really think the advent of the lean deans, the cnhis and the jrcs of the world have nothing to do with declining readership? i'm not saying it's the whole enchilada, but these 7-11s of journalism sure do contribute.
 
When is the last time you picked up a newspaper and read something and said "Holy Sh*t!" after reading a story? (and not because you were thinking what is THAT doing on the front page?)
 
DanOregon said:
When is the last time you picked up a newspaper and read something and said "Holy Sh*t!" after reading a story? (and not because you were thinking what is THAT doing on the front page?)
I'm not sure of where you are going here.
 
Boots - I mean that you don't tend to see investigative stories that really "pop" anymore. Maybe nothing surprises us anymore or the institutions covered by papers have become too astute at PR. 60 Minutes did a piece last night on a clusterf*ck with a multi-billion $$ program to refurbish the Coast Guard fleet. One of the sources of the story said he tried to get a newspaper interested in it, but they said they didn't think they'd be able to prove the allegations.
 
DanOregon said:
Boots - I mean that you don't tend to see investigative stories that really "pop" anymore. Maybe nothing surprises us anymore or the institutions covered by papers have become too astute at PR. 60 Minutes did a piece last night on a clusterf*ck with a multi-billion $$ program to refurbish the Coast Guard fleet. One of the sources of the story said he tried to get a newspaper interested in it, but they said they didn't think they'd be able to prove the allegations.
Assuming you mean the Deepwater program, the N.Y. Times had it last December: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/09/us/09ship.html?ei=5088&en=d715d64a44376dd6&ex=1323320400&partner=r...&pagewanted=print
 
Two weeks ago we're in a supervisors meeting talking about how we do this and that. The publisher -- who has no college degree, I **** you not -- asks why we ran our Education packages in Monday's paper if Monday was such a slow day for internet traffic.

The news editor explained that because of staffing attrition, we saved Education packages that are finished Thursday or Friday to run Sunday when the copy desk is short handed (they work on the layout, etc. all weekend). The publisher asked why we schedule the copy desk to be short handed on Sunday. News editor said it's because Sunday is typically a slower news day. Publisher asked why publish a Monday paper at all then.

Keep in mind we're a 40,000-circ. daily and the biggest paper in a three-hour radius.

The city editor, a woman who's been a reporter/CE at the paper for almost 15 years left the room in tears.

I keep telling myself this is cyclical, that there'll be some sort of backlash against the junk food journalism we're practicing now but, I dunno.

Part of it's the readers. We ran a lost dog story on A1 for a week and get this epic reader response. Some wrote in to tell us how stupid we were for top-shelfing an effin' pet story, most were hooked on it.

A couple weeks ago our staff ran this package on a company in Colorado that is defrauding local businesses out of thousands because they think they're donating to local athletic programs.

I got three phone calls.  ::)
 
http://blogs.eastbayexpress.com/92510/2007/06/bloodbath_at_the_chron.php

Bloodbath at the Chron
Fri Jun 08, 2007 at 02:43:00 PM
It’s been a brutal day at the San Francisco Chronicle, as managers walked from desk to desk, handpicking reporters and photographers to be laid off. “The white envelopes are going out,” said one insider. “It’s definitely a bloodbath,” added another. The Chron plans to lay off up to sixty union-represented newsroom employees in the next week. For the past week, the paper offered buyouts in an effort to cut eighty jobs, but only about twenty employees took the offer, one insider said. See the buyout offer after the jump.

Among the list of managers who were canned was the Chron’s Washington D.C. bureau chief, Marc Sandalow. He was well-known and respected reporter who provided straightforward, easy to read analysis of Washington news events. Sandalow also was a frequent guest analyst on KCBS radio. “That one had us scratching our heads – Sandalow was one of the faces of the newspaper,” said one Chron insider.

Among the reporters who reportedly took the buyout were science writer Keay Davidson and environmental reporter Glen Martin. Under the buyout, employees were offered two weeks of pay for every year of service, with a maximum payout of no more than one year’s pay. Here is a Q&A from the newspaper guild:

6/6/07 Guild Q&A on Chronicle incentive termination.
What's the buyout offer?

Two weeks pay per year of service for eligible employees, up to one year's pay, along with health care paid for up to one year. Pay is calculated based on final straight pay rate. Employees will be told individually if he or she is eligible.

Why did the Guild agree to these buyout terms?

The company announced a goal of reducing 100 newsroom jobs, including about 80 held by Guild members. We hope to avoid layoffs in the newsroom with these voluntary buyouts after we became convinced there was no other alternative. We agreed to the buyout terms in an attempt to reduce or perhaps eliminate the need for layoffs in the newsroom. Our discussions with management resulted in improvements in the original buyout, but we are convinced no better terms are available. The company has said it will not negotiate individual enhancements.

Will these buyouts avoid the need for layoffs?

That may not become clear until after the buyout phase is complete, which we expect may take about a month for all departments.

Are these job cuts going to solve the Chronicle's business problems?

Clearly not. Our members in the newsroom generate the content readers and advertisers want, and reducing newsroom jobs inevitably hurts the editorial product. We see no point in arguing against the company's decision to cut jobs -- clearly, the management has the right to reduce the force. But these short-term cost reductions should not be confused with a long-term business plan that is capable of restoring profitability.

Would it harm my career if I approach management and ask what I would be offered under a buyout package but then later decide not to take it?

Any employee is free anytime to inquire about terms if they are considering retirement or resignation. Obviously, this would be a pointless question for anyone with no desire to leave the Chronicle. It might also send an inaccurate message about one's intentions. But there should be no penalty for asking questions, and management can't take any punitive measures without due cause.


After the buyouts are done, assuming there aren’t enough, how will seniority figure into any layoffs?

Seniority is based on original hire date, then by department and classification. Under the contract, the newsroom is divided into the following departments for purposes of a layoff: sports, features, business, photography and library. Copy editors and certain news desk positions are grouped together. The remaining editorial employees are grouped as one department. Within those departments, each classification (i.e., job title as listed in the contract) are grouped separately (columnists, reporters, photographers, etc.) In the event of a layoff, the Guild must be notified one week in advance of the number, classifications and departments of jobs affected, and a seniority list must be provided. Within a week of this notice, any employee in the classification and department affected may retire, and this could reduce the number of employees designated for layoff. The employer may designate up to 25% of employees in any one classification or department as being of “major importance”, thereby saving a person with low seniority from being laid off. This designation cannot be made for arbitrary or capricious reasons.

What can the management do to me if I refuse a buyout but have enough seniority to avoid layoff, and if you turn down the offer, will your assignment change?

The employer can change schedules or assignments for business reasons, and we expect will try to minimize the disruptions that may come if sections or beats are eliminated in the smaller newsroom. No transfers or job changes can be made for punitive reasons. It's also important to keep in mind that seniority rank, and hence risk of being laid off, may change after the buyouts and any reassignments.

When will the process begin for Guild members, and how will this be done?

Meetings with individual employees will probably start at the end of this week. The employee will be called to a meeting in Human Resources, presented with a buyout offer, informed that it is voluntary, but encouraged to seriously consider it. The employee will have a week to decide whether to submit a resignation and take the money. The employee will have another week to rescind the resignation. There would be an opportunity to agree upon a termination date. Anyone signing up for this offer would, under a law that protects people from making rash decisions, have an additional 45 days to sign the separation agreement and general release.

Can an employee request Guild representation?

Yes, and we encourage individuals to do so. Guild representatives will be available and meetings may be postponed within reason to accommodate schedules.

When you are tapped on the shoulder, how will your last day of employment be determined?

The termination date will be mutually agreed upon, but must be within a reasonable time period.

If you are offered a buyout and are close to your anniversary date, how will that work in terms of years of service?

Years of service will be pro-rated, and if it is necessary to remain on the payroll longer in order reach a significant date for pension purposes, this can be worked out.

How will buyouts for part-timers be calculated?

Part-timers will be given full credit for years of service, starting with their date of hire. They would be paid their full (37.5 hours) weekly salary multiplied by the appropriate number of weeks.

Will those who either accept a buyout or are laid off be eligible for unemployment benefits, even if their pension begins?

Yes, as long as the requirements of the EDD are met.

How will my medical coverage be retained if I choose to accept the buyout?

COBRA, the federal program that guarantees your rights to continue medical insurance after termination, allows an employee to extend current medical coverage for up to 18 months. If you accept a buyout, the company makes COBRA contributions to the Guild H&W plan on your behalf to retain coverage commensurate with your buyout offer.

How does this affect the two weeks per year of service under the previous pension plan?

This benefit is totally separate from the buyout offers being made. Employees who were vested in the pension plan as of January 1, 2006 (meaning you had worked at the paper since at least January 1, 2001) are entitled to two weeks pay for every year of service. This lump sum benefit is part of the pension and is paid out to employees upon termination or retirement. Again, this is totally separate from this buyout offer.



-- Robert Gammon
 
[blue]He's letting them keep their pension vestment. What more could you ask for.[/blue]
 

Latest posts

Back
Top