My major East Coast paper this morning had a giant (almost full-page) black-and-white, poor-quality hockey photo and a quick note that the game ended too late for my edition.
Isn't there a better way?
I read the paper with lunch, so now I'm not getting news that's 10+ hours old. I know that's the reality of print, but shouldn't papers be adjusting to it. That giant photo might was well be giant text saying, "WE CAN'T GET YOU TIMELY NEWS."
Also, why waste space with a big, bad BW photo? Put something in there. A column? Feature? NFL preview stuff? There was time to plan. The 10 p.m. puck drop was not a last-minute thing.
I know the realities of newspapers. But these kinds of things make me wonder if people are trying hard enough. I'm pretty sure this kind of thing is getting worse. I see the giant BW space-filler photos all the time now. I don't ever remember seeing them a few years ago.
It seems newspapers are responding to the increased competition by dropping the quality.
Isn't there a better way?
I read the paper with lunch, so now I'm not getting news that's 10+ hours old. I know that's the reality of print, but shouldn't papers be adjusting to it. That giant photo might was well be giant text saying, "WE CAN'T GET YOU TIMELY NEWS."
Also, why waste space with a big, bad BW photo? Put something in there. A column? Feature? NFL preview stuff? There was time to plan. The 10 p.m. puck drop was not a last-minute thing.
I know the realities of newspapers. But these kinds of things make me wonder if people are trying hard enough. I'm pretty sure this kind of thing is getting worse. I see the giant BW space-filler photos all the time now. I don't ever remember seeing them a few years ago.
It seems newspapers are responding to the increased competition by dropping the quality.