Isn't it ironic?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Making fun of someone's personal life because you disagree with their politics is about as sad as it gets. This place is quickly becoming a Reddit sub-board.
 
Making fun of someone's personal life because you disagree with their politics is about as sad as it gets. This place is quickly becoming a Reddit sub-board.
I just consider the source and the fact that he's on his 11th or 12th handle because he's shamed all the previous ones.
 
You all are reading a lot more into o_t's original post than there was, I think. Geez.

And, honestly, nobody found anything about a crane owned by the bin Laden family, crashing into a mosque at Mecca and killing more than a 100 people, on 9/11, at all ironic? It was ironic, and I think that's all there was to it.

Granted, I don't know o_t personally. But I doubt many (any?) of you do, either.
 
Meanwhile, in New York on the eve of 9/11, this happened:
Rainbow-over-NY-on-911-anniversary.jpg


This is certain to upset the lefties.
 
Last edited:
You all are reading a lot more into o_t's original post than there was, I think. Geez.

And, honestly, nobody found anything about a crane owned by the bin Laden family, crashing into a mosque at Mecca and killing more than a 100 people, on 9/11, at all ironic? It was ironic, and I think that's all there was to it.

Granted, I don't know o_t personally. But I doubt many (any?) of you do, either.
Is this the first time you've seen him post?
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
No, it's not.

And I know he doesn't care for Islam and Muslims in general. But there are plenty of people who would, generally, agree with that sentiment, and who also would not bother pretending that they actually are all for supporting a religion that, frankly, seems to foster evil and destruction and narrow-mindedness more than any other, and do it just for the sake of political correctness and because it might make them appear tolerant and "better".

What's more, just because he may not actually care that 100 people who he doesn't even know died, it doesn't mean that he was rejoicing that they did, either.
 
You were online last night when he originally posted?

Hey Tony, this puts you in good company with the other treats Write defends.
 
You all are reading a lot more into o_t's original post than there was, I think. Geez.

And, honestly, nobody found anything about a crane owned by the bin Laden family, crashing into a mosque at Mecca and killing more than a 100 people, on 9/11, at all ironic? It was ironic, and I think that's all there was to it.

Granted, I don't know o_t personally. But I doubt many (any?) of you do, either.

The thread title was much, much different than it is now. Hence, the reaction.
 
No, it's not.

And I know he doesn't care for Islam and Muslims in general. But there are plenty of people who would, generally, agree with that sentiment, and who also would not bother pretending that they actually are all for supporting a religion that, frankly, seems to foster evil and destruction and narrow-mindedness more than any other, and do it just for the sake of political correctness and because it might make them appear tolerant and "better".

What's more, just because he may not actually care that 100 people who he doesn't even know died, it doesn't mean that he was rejoicing that they did, either.

He characterized their deaths as a positive intervention by G-d. That sure as hell sounds like rejoicing.

Then again, you seem to share his issues with Muslims.

Is it possible that tony doesn't mean any of this crap and he's playing a character? Perhaps. I haven't met him in person. But I have seen posts that reveal bigotry, hatred and the capacity to derive joy from the suffering of others. Just as I have seen a capacity within you to staunchly defend people who do disgusting things just because their beliefs align with yours.
 
And you do actually care that those people died?

Sure you do...

I won't defend anybody rejoicing over general people's deaths, but you should get my point. It is quite possible to think that, frankly, yes, the world would be a better place without Islam, and yet not celebrate people's deaths. There is a difference.
 
Write and Tony can be SJ's new Christian power couple.
 
Write and Tony can be SJ's new Christian power couple.

Don't go there, JC. Or JohnHammond.

You know nothing about me, or my faith or Christianity as I practice it, or the store where I work, or how I treat others. Because you've apparently learned nothing and don't have very good instincts or much intuitiveness or empathy.
 
And you do actually care that those people died?

Sure you do...

I won't defend anybody rejoicing over general people's deaths, but you should get my point. It is quite possible to think that, frankly, yes, the world would be a better place without Islam, and yet not celebrate people's deaths. There is a difference.

It is an awful thing that 107 people died. Yes, I care. Is it dominating my day? No, but it is sad.

And you are defending somebody rejoicing in their deaths. You are doing that by defending tony. Perhaps you don't understand what he did because he changed the title of the thread, but he is taking joy from the death of 107 human beings, calling it proof that the G-d he loves is taking an active role in the world.

Stating that the world would be better off without Islam is bigotry. Pure and simple. You softened the statement a bit, but if that was your point, you were showing yourself to be a bigot.
 
Oh, I do think the world would be better off without Islam. No doubt about it, and I don't apologize for thinking that.

I also don't pretend not to think it.

That does not, however, keep me from being just fine with the few peace-loving, normal, non-fanatic Muslims that I do know personally. Because I know them and have come to like them. I also suspect that o_t would be just fine with them, too. Because he'd know them personally.

The point of that is that knowing and liking someone personally, individually and face-to-face is not the same as knowing and liking -- or disliking -- people (or their religion) generally, especially when there actually is good reason to do so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top