Bob Cook said:britwrit said:BTExpress said:I guess some (I'm not saying YOU are doing this) could argue that the only way to maintain order in that region is to commit the war crimes and atrocities Saddam committed, but I can't accept that, and neither should the U.S. and its allies.
OK, so you say Plan A cannot be accepted. Understandable.
We tried Plan B. It was a catastrophe.
What is/was Plan C?
In a perfect world, getting Saudi Arabia and the other gulf states who are funding ISIS to knock it off. Failing that, we can help the Iraqi government.... at the price of them stopping supporting Iran as they support the Assad regime in Syria.
Of course, what will happen is that we'll muddle through, keeping the Sunni radicals from stringing up Shiite thugs from Baghdad lampposts and the body count of the innocents will skyrocket. Hooray.
Well, that's the problem. How are we going to get them to knock it off? The answer is, we won't. And as far as helping the Iraqi government, hell, we created it. We've picked leaders and guided things along the way. That hasn't worked out so well.
According to the article I read in the Times this morning, the Pentagon estimates that hardcore fighters in Iraq only number 3,000 to 5,000. Using air power and drones would go a long way to helping the Iraqi army (which, admittedly, seems to need all the help it can get.)
Otherwise, what happens? Iran steps in and crushes ISIS. They're going to get crushed no matter what, so we might as well be the ones doing the crushing.