In your perfect world, what cities and/or eras would you like to work in?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hockeybeat
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

H

hockeybeat

Guest
So, I'm sitting at home watching The Rocket: The Legend Of Maurice Richard (side note: No thanks to the people at Barnes & Noble, who said, "Sir, we received your order but there was a snafu. We don't have the DVD. We have The Rocket: The Legend of Morris Richard." Yeah. Morris Richard. He played for the Knicks in the 50s. Dolts. Anyway, I disgress).

And I began to think. If you had your choice to live and work in any city, where would it be? If you had your choice to live and work in any era, what would it be?

Since I started this thread, I'll start:

If I could live and work in any city, it would be either Toronto or Montreal. There's just something about a hockey-mad city that calls out to me. And I would love to have covered the Canadiens during the Maurice Richard era.

EDIT: I'm sure this thread has been done to death in the past. So if it is a D_B, my humblest apologies for wasting the board's time.
 
I'm not a sportswriter, so mine's not tied to covering a particular team or sport. But I think it'd have been awesome to be covering New York City in the 60s and early 70s, when Breslin, Mailer, Hamill, Tom Wolfe, Gay Talese, etc., were re-inventing the game of journalism. To say nothing of the stories to be told. Present at history, that sort of thing.
 
Denver in the 80s and Chicago when the Blackhawks were good and the blues music was being played by guys not alive today.
 
Covering boxing in the 1930s would have been fun. Major sport at the time. Living in the Depression wouldn't have been so fun, though.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Would there have been a better place to live than LA in the late 1950s-early 1960s, with great weather, reasonable traffic and real-estate prices, and the Dodgers, Lakers, and USC and UCLA football and UCLA basketball?
 
MU_was_not_so_hard said:
buckweaver said:
Surprise! Chicago, circa 1920s.

Seems like it would have been more interesting during and before '19.

Nah, 1920 was when everything bubbled over and finally blew up. Then the trial in 1921, and the banished Sox playing all over the country in semipro games throughout the decade.

1919 was pretty tame, compared to afterward.
 
Tom Petty said:
1950s covering baseball in new york.

'50s would have been great, too, especially with Jackie Robinson finally breaking into the bigs and Mantle in his prime.
 
bigpern23 said:
Tom Petty said:
1950s covering baseball in new york.

'50s would have been great, too, especially with Jackie Robinson finally breaking into the bigs and Mantle in his prime.

i'm sure a beatless baseball job didn't exist, but imagine if it did.

series titles for the giants, dodgers and the ****ing yankees, jackie in the late '40s, willie, mickey and the duke and the giants' and dodgers' move west.

good god. talk about sweet.
 
micropolitan guy said:
Would there have been a better place to live than LA in the late 1950s-early 1960s, with great weather, reasonable traffic and real-estate prices, and the Dodgers, Lakers, and USC and UCLA football and UCLA basketball?

Do we get to go back knowing what we know now? I'd buy up every square inch of land I could afford.
 
ArnoldBabar said:
micropolitan guy said:
Would there have been a better place to live than LA in the late 1950s-early 1960s, with great weather, reasonable traffic and real-estate prices, and the Dodgers, Lakers, and USC and UCLA football and UCLA basketball?

Do we get to go back knowing what we know now? I'd buy up every square inch of land I could afford.

no.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top