In Touch Weekly: Will and Jada Pinkett Smith separate

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

imjustagirl

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2002
Messages
51,842
City & State/Province
Everywhere
http://www.intouchweekly.com/2011/08/in_touch_weekly_exclusive_will_and_jada_pinkett_smith_separate.php

This is actually surprising to me. They seemed really solid, and even openly talked about how they would be open with each other if they needed to step outside the marriage. I don't like Smith, but I oddly liked them together.
 
This would make me sad. They seemed pretty solid. Maybe it was an act...

I like him a lot. I don't particularly care for her, but I liked them as a couple.
 
Wait, isn't In Touch the one that never gets anything right?

For a second, I thought this was that People Magazine spinoff... In Style or something...
 
I don't think In Touch's ratio is any worse or better than any other. Unless you're counting the "Angelina and Brad are getting married!" stuff, which everyone does every two months and they're always wrong.
 
Perhaps the pressure of raising child stars got to them. I don't mind either one of them (especially him), but the stuff with their kids was quickly becoming annoying...
 
Didn't they dabble in Scientology?

Maybe one wanted to continue to pursue it and one realized it's bull ****.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
imjustagirl said:
I don't think In Touch's ratio is any worse or better than any other. Unless you're counting the "Angelina and Brad are getting married!" stuff, which everyone does every two months and they're always wrong.

I forget which magazine it was that reported that Jessica Simpson was pregnant the same week she filed for divorce from Nick Lachey.

For a gossip rag, I don't know if I can remember US Weekly being straight-up wrong.
 
YankeeFan said:
Didn't they dabble in Scientology?

Maybe one wanted to continue to pursue it and one realized it's bull ****.

For some reason, I think she was more into it than he was, which would make sense since she's the one who is close with Tom Cruise. I forget which movie they were in together, maybe Collateral?
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
This would make me sad. They seemed pretty solid. Maybe it was an act...

I like him a lot. I don't particularly care for her, but I liked them as a couple.

This ....
 
imjustagirl said:
US Weekly is my bible. No lie.

I love US Weekly. The only magazines I subscribe to are Esquire and Entertainment Weekly, but I usually read US Weekly as well.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
imjustagirl said:
I don't think In Touch's ratio is any worse or better than any other. Unless you're counting the "Angelina and Brad are getting married!" stuff, which everyone does every two months and they're always wrong.

I forget which magazine it was that reported that Jessica Simpson was pregnant the same week she filed for divorce from Nick Lachey.

Apparently it was Star.

http://thebosh.com/archives/2005/11/pregnant_jessic.php
 
They're saying it's not true...

http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2011/08/23/2011-08-23_will_smith_jada_pinkett_smith_separate_after_13_years_of_marriage_and_two_childr.html
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
This would make me sad. They seemed pretty solid. Maybe it was an act...

I like him a lot. I don't particularly care for her, but I liked them as a couple.
couldn't be an act, neither one is that good
 
All the denial means is that if it is true, they can't admit it for another few months, or until the day after Will's next press tour is over.
 
Ace said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
This would make me sad. They seemed pretty solid. Maybe it was an act...

I like him a lot. I don't particularly care for her, but I liked them as a couple.

This ....

This too, but they also need to keep the kid under wraps....
 

Latest posts

Back
Top