If you cover high school/low-level college, do you "@" the players/teams on Twitter?

[Kayaugstin Kott]

From the sportswriters I follow, it seems 50-50 as to whether reporters will Tweet like:
"Frank Pippen scored 12 points in Podunk Valley's win."
or
".@FrankPippen17 scored 12 points in @PodunkValleyHS win."

Thoughts?

 

[nubyjas_wilborn]

From the sportswriters I follow, it seems 50-50 as to whether reporters will Tweet like:
"Frank Pippen scored 12 points in Podunk Valley's win."
or
".@FrankPippen17 scored 12 points in @PodunkValleyHS win."

Thoughts?

I do it. Very easy to engage your readers. Plus if it's a big recruit he/she may have more followers than his & it's an easy to get extra eyes on your work.

 

[Matt Stephens]

I do quite a bit and I cover the Mountain West. The players at CSU follow me anyway, but it's helped pick up followers from other players around the league, and extends my reach in the Mountain West when they RT.

 

[MeanGreenATO]

I've always considered a good idea because of the reasons listed above. But what if those kids aren't doing so well? Do you still tag them in tweets?

 

[HackyMcHack]

I do it only if the kid is getting major recruiting looks. Between football and basketball this season, I think I used handles for only three players ... both of the football players signed with power five conference schools, while the basketball player still has a year of school remaining.

 

[Kayaugstin Kott]

I've always considered a good idea because of the reasons listed above. But what if those kids aren't doing so well? Do you still tag them in tweets?

Personally, I've always just tagged the players when it has to do with something big. Scoring their 1,000th career point, being named the paper's MVP, making All-State. ... Not so much in reporting game scores.

 

[Rhody31]

When I started using Twitter at my last job, I didn't with every high school team. It just felt creepy.
With some of the teams I covered on a regular basis, I started using @ when I could find them. It felt less creepy because these were teams and players I had covered for four years or so. I caught some slack from people about it (some people who now do the same thing), but it helped gain some followers and views to the website.
For playoffs, it was a nice tool to keep readers (mainly the young ones) up to date. Problem was, this was about a year or two before Twitter became what it is now, but I would highly recommend it for anything involving a highlight. I use it for my side/fun project and it's amazing how many web hits I get with one RT.

 

[Southwinds]

Never.

All of the responses above are valid arguments, but there are two reasons why I don't do it.

One, if someone's handle is something obscure, like @The_Tw31nty_One, who the heck is going to know who that is without clicking on the name/seeing it over and over again?

Two, if you tag an athlete's name in your tweets when you're gushing over them, you have to do it when you're not. If you don't, it looks like you're unwilling to face the music. And, if you do, then you better be prepared to be called out for it.

There's a writer I know who tags players incessantly, even when he gives HOT TAKES! and calls them out by name. Several players have made their displeasure with the guy, simply for that reason, well known.

 

[JRoyal]

I see no reason not to. Can get you re-tweeted to an audience that doesn't follow you, and can get you showing up in searches that people do for the athletes. If you aren't doing it, you're wasting a tool for engagement and expanding your audience. In the case of obscure names, you may need to use the person's given name in the post and add the Twitter handle at the end (Joe Blow scored 44 in UCO's big win. http://linky.link @Joe_Is_Awesome).

And I'm not so sure that you always have to tag them. If you're using their actual name in negative posts, it will show up in most searches for the person. And you're not looking for the person to re-tweet you if it's negative. The purpose doing it would be to expand your audience. If the guy isn't going to re-tweet it, there's no point. When a player from the local HS runs for 300 yards, you tag him so maybe he'll re-tweet you. When he's arrested the next week for robbing a taxi, why is it necessary to tag him then as well? The tweet will mention him by name. I don't see why it's necessary to tag him in the latter case.

 

[JRoyal]

But if it's a matter of tagging him in both positive and negative tweets or not tagging at all, I think it's blind to go the route of not tagging at all unless the character limit becomes an issue.

 

[JimmyHoward33]

Teams/schools yes, most of those are run by coaches or ADs and you can get a lot of eyeballs that way. Kids, for the most part, no. As stated above, if their handle is some unrecognizable thing that's not their name, it looks stupid to the average reader. Also feels creepy.

To me there's a line between letting them know you're covering their stuff and pandering for re-tweets though. Someone regularly tags the schools in tweets about schedule changes, as if the schools aren't already aware they've changed their schedules...

 

[Matt Stephens]

If I'm tagging someone who has a weird handle, I'll say, "John Doe (@GetDoeWithTheSickness) scores 98 points in win vs. StateU." A good way around it to save characters sometimes is tweet the story and attach a photo (photos take up more real estate in a Twitter feed and get more eyeballs), then tag the photo itself.

 

[JRoyal]

Teams/schools yes, most of those are run by coaches or ADs and you can get a lot of eyeballs that way. Kids, for the most part, no. As stated above, if their handle is some unrecognizable thing that's not their name, it looks stupid to the average reader. Also feels creepy.

To me there's a line between letting them know you're covering their stuff and pandering for re-tweets though. Someone regularly tags the schools in tweets about schedule changes, as if the schools aren't already aware they've changed their schedules...

So you don't think you should be trying to get re-tweets? That seems shortsighted to me. I'd think you'd want your work exposed to as many people as possible to get as many hits as possible. It's one thing if it's a kiss-ass tweet; you shouldn't be posting those. But if it's a legit tweet, why not include it, even if it's not a link to a story, so that you could conceivably add a few followers, which could mean more clicks on links when you send out stories later?

And some people have saved searches set up for certain Twitter handles, so including it in your tweet would help reach those users. It's pretty common for people to search for a user's Twitter name to find tweets mentioning them when that person, group or organization is in the news.

 

[Kayaugstin Kott]

So you don't think you should be trying to get re-tweets? That seems shortsighted to me. I'd think you'd want your work exposed to as many people as possible to get as many hits as possible. It's one thing if it's a kiss-ass tweet; you shouldn't be posting those. But if it's a legit tweet, why not include it, even if it's not a link to a story, so that you could conceivably add a few followers, which could mean more clicks on links when you send out stories later?

To sort of back up JimmyHoward's point on this, my thinking is: If you already have that foothold, and everybody who's anybody in your beat already follows you, the athletes will already be following you and often see your tweet. Or, even better, they'll search for your handle after a game knowing you posted it.

I think tagging athletes works best if you're trying to break through on a new beat and gain followers, or you have news you feel they would be very happy to share, like an all-state nod. Kinda kiss-ass, maybe, but something worth celebrating for the athlete.

 

[JimmyHoward33]

There's a difference between trying to get RTs and pandering. You have to find the line that works for you and your company.

Also a huge pet peeve when people are @'ing the subject of their news and lead off the Tweet with @ ; The vast majority of your followers can't read that unless they're following that guy too. You need a . in front of that @, or just reword your Tweet.

If you say "@JoeBlow33 has committed to State U" no one can read it unless they're following Joe Blow. Should say ".@JoeBlow33 has committed to State U."

 

[Ace]

Here is the bottom line: One of the best ways to "build your brand" is to have a lot of Twitter followers. I would enage the people you cover as much as possible.

Not only do they see that you follow them, you become the source for that school/team.

If I am out running around and am interested in a game, I follow it via Twitter by people who cover that team.

Building your brand helps you keep your job, and can lead to other opportunities.

So whatever you can do to become the expert on your beat (within reason) and get eyeballs on you, you do it.

 

[dirtybird]

In a numbers based world, you definitely should. Kids retweet it, friends retweet it, throw a link in there and maybe it gets some momentum.

 

[Golazo21]

I apologize if this is the wrong place to ask, but figured it'd be dumb to start a new thread entirely...

I cover MLS, and I'm starting to see more of my peers using players' handles in their tweets. I've always been of the mind that it wasn't proper etiquette to do so, but seeing at least three longtime, respected scribes undertake this practice in recent weeks has me wondering whether I missed a memo or something. Personally, I don't feel comfortable using a pro athlete's handle when I'm tweeting, whether it's about a story or simple comment on a play or situation.

Am I behind the times on this?

 

[Kayaugstin Kott]

I apologize if this is the wrong place to ask, but figured it'd be dumb to start a new thread entirely...

I cover MLS, and I'm starting to see more of my peers using players' handles in their tweets. I've always been of the mind that it wasn't proper etiquette to do so, but seeing at least three longtime, respected scribes undertake this practice in recent weeks has me wondering whether I missed a memo or something. Personally, I don't feel comfortable using a pro athlete's handle when I'm tweeting, whether it's about a story or simple comment on a play or situation.

Am I behind the times on this?

I would imagine the players aren't RT'ing those tweets, right? I think the advantage to tagging athletes is them sharing your work, thus giving you more exposure.

If you're writing a feature on one of the players, I'd definitely tag them. For simple PxP, though? Seems like that's overdoing it, to me at least.

 

[naturenick]

I started doing it ever since I asked a fellow reporter's daughter (who is also a high school athlete), "Would you rather get your name in the paper or a shout out on Twitter?" and she replied "Oh, shout out on Twitter, definitely."