hockeybeat said:This Is Pubic Tap said:Yeah... and the Marlins have (right now... not in the future) two twos and three threes.hockeybeat said:This Is Pubic Tap said:hockeybeat said:Other than Dontrelle, the Marlins don't have a pitcher that the Mets want.
I thought I was posing this question among a constituency that knows baseball....
So, you're out...
If the Mets were building for three years from now, then, yes, the Mets need to swap rotations. But the Mets are dead-set on winning this year or next. As of today, the Mets have:
A No. 2 Â in Pedro.
A No. 3 in Glavine.
A boatload of No. 5s in Trachsel, El Duque, Maine, Pelfrey and Bannister.
You said that Dontrelle is the only pitcher the Mets would want.
In slotting where the guys go in the rotation, I think Dintrelle is the only guy beaten out by a Met
Pedro over Dontrelle slightly
Josh Johnson over Glavine
Scott Olsen over Trachsel
Anibel Sanchez over El Duque
Ricky Nolasco over... whoever
If you're building long term, then, yes, you go with the Marlins' rotation.
But, save for Dontrelle, how many post-season games has this rotation won? Pedro's won playoff games. So has Glavine. So has El Duque.
You think Glavine is getting it back?
If he were 34, I'd agree.
El Duque... isn't that like betting on 0/00?
If Glavine comes back... all props to you.