SixToe said:
If you told the kids you worked at the paper and to stop or you wouldn't cover them, they'd tell you to **** off.
If you put their names in your story, or what they were doing, then you'd look like the previously noted douchebag.
I guess you weren't kidding. Blue font meter not needed.
For sunflower seeds, yeah, it'd be douchey. For ****ty behavior, nope.
Years ago, I covered a basketball game in which the local student section was getting really out of hand with taunting the opposition. Visiting coach complained, and the home school's superintendent went over to tell the kids to cool it.
Instead of shutting up, the kids start yelling back at the super. And the parents, sitting in a different section, instead of telling their own kids to shut up, also start yelling at the super.
Meanwhile, I, camera in hand, trying to be unobtrusive, walk over and take a couple of pics of the super telling off the kids, and eventually ejecting them.
AFter the game, a couple of angry parents came to me and asked if the pics were going to run. I was non-committal because I didn't know if they came out (pre-digital era), and I told them I'd discuss it with my bosses. They got pissed, and I told them that the kids' behavior was more newsworthy than the game.
Pics came out OK, but the bosses decided not to run them. The crowd behavior was the main focus of the story, although I did devote roughly half of it to the actual game. No names were put in, but it seemed like everyone got the message. They cooled down for the rest of the season.