Mighty_Wingman
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2003
- Messages
- 3,552
In the wake of Sept. 11, it seemed like the newspaper industry -- even on this board -- was determined to stop using words like "war" and "hero" in sports stories. I recall quite a few self-serving columns about it, how it was just wrong to talk about an athlete's "courage" when the real definition of courage was firefighters and cops and so forth.
And yet here we are, five years later, and war/hero/courage-type words are everywhere. The Sporting News is putting out a whole NFL book titled "Warriors," for God's sake. Sometimes, it seems like every other story I read is about Ray Lewis' courage, or how Peter Pencildick was "the hero" of Podunk Prep's win against Uptown Academy.
So what happened? Is this all OK again?
Somebody -- maybe on this very board -- once wrote, that if you need Sept. 11 or Hurricane Katrina "to put sports in perspective," you're an idiot. And I agree. But still, don't words like this blur that perspective?
I haven't written "hero" or "battle" or even "bomb" or "foe" in more than five years. How is everyone else handling this kind of thing?
And yet here we are, five years later, and war/hero/courage-type words are everywhere. The Sporting News is putting out a whole NFL book titled "Warriors," for God's sake. Sometimes, it seems like every other story I read is about Ray Lewis' courage, or how Peter Pencildick was "the hero" of Podunk Prep's win against Uptown Academy.
So what happened? Is this all OK again?
Somebody -- maybe on this very board -- once wrote, that if you need Sept. 11 or Hurricane Katrina "to put sports in perspective," you're an idiot. And I agree. But still, don't words like this blur that perspective?
I haven't written "hero" or "battle" or even "bomb" or "foe" in more than five years. How is everyone else handling this kind of thing?