NightHawk112005
Member
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2008
- Messages
- 888
Cosmo said:NightHawk112005 said:Fredrick said:Cosmo I think you have the right attitude. It's their coverage and their decision. You don't drive nine hours in one day.
A 4.5 hour trip should mean going the night before and coming back after the game the next day if it's a day game.
If it's a night game, go down the day of the game and stay all night.
If the paper doesn't want to do that it is the paper's loss.
Not yours.
I disagree, it kind of is my loss. I want to get the best story I can at all times, and if I don't, I feel like I'm not doing my job.
Eh, again, I disagree. You're doing your job the best you can with the tools given you. If they expect you to travel on your own dime, what's next? No mileage? Pay for your own meals? It's a dangerous, slippery slope that I'm not willing to go down at this point in my career.
I felt much differently when I was 22-23, was working at a 10K and wanted to pile up clips going to the pro sporting events two hours down the road. That's a different situation, and the paper pretty much said, you go on your own dime or you don't go at all.
If the company says, "no, we're not paying for the trip," then I say, "fine, I'm not going."
I'm not disagreeing that it compromises your beat. It does. But that's the paper's problem, not yours. These newspaper companies will stab you in the back at any opportunity. Don't for a second forget that. Do not go out of your way at personal cost because "the readers deserve better."
It still is my problem, though. Compromising my beat is certainly my problem, and it's one I want to help solve if there's any way I can. I'm not at the point where I can say otherwise, and I hope I never get there. I hope this beat is always this important to me. If I can say it's not my problem, then it's probably time for me to find another field of work.