Fredo's Biggest Lie...Ever!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fenian_Bastard
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Status
Not open for further replies.
jgmacg said:
Yawn has outfunted his coverage.

yawn is the posterchild for the sheer number of idiots we have in this country who voted for W twice. i mean really, we read his pure and unadulterated **** and all chuckle to ourselves, but we really shouldn't laugh when we think about how low the line of critical thinking has fallen in our country.
 
You guys have never come across a media bias or media spin have you? If not, you obviously haven't kept up with the Spitzer story (33rd graph for his party identification? C'mon.)

I read this **** going both ways and cannot fathom how we have so many geniuses who have labeled Bush as everything including a criminal and yet half the country did vote for him - twice. You people were probably among those whining when he first got elected. When you call people idiots, you're talking about half the country, which by basic math and logic, doesn't seem like a case for idiocy to me. Seems rather like political thinking.

If he's a criminal, then where has your Democratic leadership been regarding getting rid of him? Too busy covering their own asses, no doubt.

Just my 2 cents.
 
What was sold/purported (a) had scant resemblance to the truth, and (b) wasn't what we got.

Are you pleased with recent proceedings?
 
Ben_Hecht said:
What was sold/purported (a) had scant resemblance to the truth, and (b) wasn't what we got.

Are you pleased with recent proceedings?

This was never about the "truth" or what anyone was sold to anyone. America was all for invading Iraq when they thought we'd march in, it'd be a cakewalk, we'd take out the "bad guy," our soldiers would have roses thrown at their feet and they'd be home in three weeks.

Then when they realized we had ****ed it all up, they were against the whole thing -- and if you listened to some people who are full of ****, they had ALWAYS been against it, even though support for the invasion had been ridiculously high.

Interesting thing to me is that no matter how many times history gets rewritten--in a matter of minutes, really--people really don't change.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/13/politics/politico/main3933699.shtml?source=mostpop_story
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
The Big Ragu said:
Ben_Hecht said:
What was sold/purported (a) had scant resemblance to the truth, and (b) wasn't what we got.

Are you pleased with recent proceedings?

This was never about the "truth" or what anyone was sold to anyone. America was all for invading Iraq when they thought we'd march in, it'd be a cakewalk, we'd take out the "bad guy," our soldiers would have roses thrown at their feet and they'd be home in three weeks.

Then when they realized we had ****ed it all up, they were against the whole thing -- and if you listened to some people who are full of ****, they had ALWAYS been against it, even though support for the invasion had been ridiculously high.

Interesting thing to me is that no matter how many times history gets rewritten in the matter of minutes, people really don't change.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/13/politics/politico/main3933699.shtml?source=mostpop_story


The "march in" and "cakewalk" was represented/presented as such by Cheney and Rumsfeld . . . . 30-plus years of combined obliviousness -- and wrong, again.

A sales job, yes . . . of tragic -- if not criminal -- proportions.
 
Ben_Hecht said:
The Big Ragu said:
Ben_Hecht said:
What was sold/purported (a) had scant resemblance to the truth, and (b) wasn't what we got.

Are you pleased with recent proceedings?

This was never about the "truth" or what anyone was sold to anyone. America was all for invading Iraq when they thought we'd march in, it'd be a cakewalk, we'd take out the "bad guy," our soldiers would have roses thrown at their feet and they'd be home in three weeks.

Then when they realized we had ****ed it all up, they were against the whole thing -- and if you listened to some people who are full of ****, they had ALWAYS been against it, even though support for the invasion had been ridiculously high.

Interesting thing to me is that no matter how many times history gets rewritten in the matter of minutes, people really don't change.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/13/politics/politico/main3933699.shtml?source=mostpop_story


The "march in" and "cakewalk" was represented/presented as such by Cheney and Rumsfeld . . . . 30-plus years of combined obliviousness -- and wrong, again.

A sales job, yes . . . of tragic -- if not criminal -- proportions.

Maybe... But they didn't have to do a whole lot of selling. People are still buying.

Wrap it in the flag, promise we'll take out an Ayatollah or two and America'd be all for invading Iran tomorrow.
 
The Big Ragu said:
Ben_Hecht said:
The Big Ragu said:
Ben_Hecht said:
What was sold/purported (a) had scant resemblance to the truth, and (b) wasn't what we got.

Are you pleased with recent proceedings?

This was never about the "truth" or what anyone was sold to anyone. America was all for invading Iraq when they thought we'd march in, it'd be a cakewalk, we'd take out the "bad guy," our soldiers would have roses thrown at their feet and they'd be home in three weeks.

Then when they realized we had ****ed it all up, they were against the whole thing -- and if you listened to some people who are full of ****, they had ALWAYS been against it, even though support for the invasion had been ridiculously high.

Interesting thing to me is that no matter how many times history gets rewritten in the matter of minutes, people really don't change.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/13/politics/politico/main3933699.shtml?source=mostpop_story


The "march in" and "cakewalk" was represented/presented as such by Cheney and Rumsfeld . . . . 30-plus years of combined obliviousness -- and wrong, again.

A sales job, yes . . . of tragic -- if not criminal -- proportions.

Maybe... But they didn't have to do a whole lot of selling. People are still buying.

Wrap it in the flag, promise we'll take out an Ayatollah or two and America'd be all for invading Iran tomorrow.


They haven't done it, because they can't sell it. They've polled it, and folks are hip to the jive. Folks don't want to play. They see all this money being pissed down a rathole, and they've had it.
 
Fourth and 8 said:
You guys have never come across a media bias or media spin have you? If not, you obviously haven't kept up with the Spitzer story (33rd graph for his party identification? C'mon.)

I read this **** going both ways and cannot fathom how we have so many geniuses who have labeled Bush as everything including a criminal and yet half the country did vote for him - twice. You people were probably among those whining when he first got elected. When you call people idiots, you're talking about half the country, which by basic math and logic, doesn't seem like a case for idiocy to me. Seems rather like political thinking.

If he's a criminal, then where has your Democratic leadership been regarding getting rid of him? Too busy covering their own asses, no doubt.

Just my 2 cents.

yes, a media conspiracy concocted by thousands of individuals working at different outlets.

the premise of your entire post is laughable. so is the post itself.

hope you're enjoying the weather down south.
 
Tom Petty said:
Fourth and 8 said:
You guys have never come across a media bias or media spin have you? If not, you obviously haven't kept up with the Spitzer story (33rd graph for his party identification? C'mon.)

I read this **** going both ways and cannot fathom how we have so many geniuses who have labeled Bush as everything including a criminal and yet half the country did vote for him - twice. You people were probably among those whining when he first got elected. When you call people idiots, you're talking about half the country, which by basic math and logic, doesn't seem like a case for idiocy to me. Seems rather like political thinking.

If he's a criminal, then where has your Democratic leadership been regarding getting rid of him? Too busy covering their own asses, no doubt.

Just my 2 cents.

yes, a media conspiracy concocted by thousands of individuals working at different outlets.

the premise of your entire post is laughable. so is the post itself.

hope you're enjoying the weather down south.

You just weren't invited to the meetings, Tom. Every Tuesday at 8, at the Masonic Temple in Skokie, Ill. Business meeting at 8, darts and pool at 9. First-timers have to bring the cookies and punch.
Oh, and the Red Rat Runs at Dawn. ;)
 
Tom Petty said:
Fourth and 8 said:
You guys have never come across a media bias or media spin have you? If not, you obviously haven't kept up with the Spitzer story (33rd graph for his party identification? C'mon.)

I read this **** going both ways and cannot fathom how we have so many geniuses who have labeled Bush as everything including a criminal and yet half the country did vote for him - twice. You people were probably among those whining when he first got elected. When you call people idiots, you're talking about half the country, which by basic math and logic, doesn't seem like a case for idiocy to me. Seems rather like political thinking.

If he's a criminal, then where has your Democratic leadership been regarding getting rid of him? Too busy covering their own asses, no doubt.

Just my 2 cents.

yes, a media conspiracy concocted by thousands of individuals working at different outlets.

the premise of your entire post is laughable. so is the post itself.

hope you're enjoying the weather down south.

You're an asshole to anybody who doesn't share your views. Being so superior, why aren't you anything other than a peon at a smalltown newspaper?
 
Yawn, do you have any idea at all who TP really is?
No?
Then shut the hell up.
 
Yawn said:
Do you have any idea who I am?

No.

Then likewise.

Fine, but I didn't call you a "peon at a smalltown newspaper," did I? (Which Tom isn't, by the way).
All I know about you, Yawn, is that you're a far-right crazy who, despite your slinging the phrase at Tom, is the best example I've seen on this board of, "You're an asshole to anybody who doesn't share your views."
Have a nice night.
 
That pretty much means he's an asshole to everyone, doesn't it? Except hondo and zagoshe, I suppose. You ever notice that trolls don't attack each other?
 
DemoChristian said:
Yawn said:
Do you have any idea who I am?

No.

Then likewise.

Fine, but I didn't call you a "peon at a smalltown newspaper," did I? (Which Tom isn't, by the way).
All I know about you, Yawn, is that you're a far-right crazy who, despite your slinging the phrase at Tom, is the best example I've seen on this board of, "You're an asshole to anybody who doesn't share your views."
Have a nice night.

you're going to convert me yet.
 
Fenian - you are such a hypocrite.

You said Bush would be in his 20's as a sockless drunk and you said it as if you thought it was a bad thing!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top