Baron Scicluna
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2007
- Messages
- 44,885
Captain Obvious said:Baron, it still wasn't an authorization problem. I hope you didn't get basic facts like this wrong when you were in newspapers. I also don't trust a newspaper reporter who likely knows little about fertilizer plant regulation to give readers a correct interpretation of relevant law and regulations.
Issues with the media aside, fact is, the company didn't report the relevant factual information to the regulators. The regulators, rather than be able to inspect the plants to verify it, had to rely on the company's information and operate as such. The company had more chemicals than what they were supposed to have, but the regulators couldn't/wouldn't verify it, because of the lack of resources
Or, put it another way. If the company tells regulators that they have X amount of one chemical, then comes back to them later and says, "Hey, you know how we said we have X amount of this chemical? Well, we actually have double that amount. Oh, and we also have 540,000 pounds of this other chemical," that wouldn't trigger an alarm with the regulators? And they wouldn't treat that company's situation differently?