Does Eric Lindros belong in the HHOF?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JR
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

JR

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2002
Messages
31,657
Yeah, yeah, I know, there's a hockey thread but this is an interesting debate, at least for puckheads.

Damien Cox makes the case for and against:

http://www.thestar.com/Sports/NHL/article/274621

Cox says yup--mainly based on the paramaters they've set in recent years.

I call it the Cam Neely syndrome. If he belongs in the Hall, so does Lindros.
 
I don't think there's any way he gets in. His stats just don't hold up. He never scored 50 goals in a season, and only scored more than 100 points once.
 
I go back to Neely.

Lindros had a better career than Neely in terms of points--by 170 points.

And if 50 goals was a factor in determining eligibility, it would be a "Closet of Fame".

Personally, I don't think either belong.
 
Don't discount the personality factor when it comes to Neely, JR. By all accounts, he's an unbelievably nice guy. I'm sure that helped his case. Can't say the same for Lindros.

Not saying that should be a legitimate criteria for enshrinement, but no one can deny it helps.
 
Lindros wasn't Mr. Bubbly but he never came off as prick--at least in the media.

Like I said in the hockey thread, he always struck me as a slightly tragic figure--he never seemed to achieve the demands of his parents, his fans and the hockey world in general.
 
What is criteria for Hall ? Is it just NHL or does it include amateur performance as well?
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Exactly. He was touted as the next Hull, the next Lemieux, the next whomever. It never really panned out, save three good seasons.
 
Lindros was an incredibly intimidating figure at times, but he shouldn't be confused with a HOFer.
 
Boom_70 said:
What is criteria for Hall ? Is it just NHL or does it include amateur performance as well?
Who knows? I don't think a player's junior career is relevant. If that were the case Darcy Tucker will get in based on his three Memorial Cup Championships with Kamloops

Tretiak is in the Hall based on one eight game series from what I can gather. And yet, Paul Henderson isn't. Go figure.

And Bob Pulford's in the Hall for what reason exactly?
 
JR said:
Lindros wasn't Mr. Bubbly but he never came off as prick--at least in the media.

Like I said in the hockey thread, he always struck me as a slightly tragic figure--he never seemed to achieve the demands of his parents, his fans and the hockey world in general.

That's gotta hurt him for HOF. I'm not a diehard hockey fan and when I hear "Lindros" the first word that comes to mind is "bust." I know he wasn't that bad but how many guys, in any sport, get into the HOF yet make you whisper "he shoulda been a little better"?
 
Play,

"Bust" may be a little harsh.

"Unfulfilled", maybe?

For a big guy he sure was fragile.

Everything changed after the Stevens hit.
 
Sirs, Madames,

If you asked Habs from the mid-90s, they'd have told you he should go there immediately.

I think he won't be voted in, but should be ... citing not just Neely, but also Joe Mullen and Federko, marginal recent picks. Lindros = Koufax sorta. Short career, but for a stretch in the 90s he was the best player on the most feared line in the league. And he was never a bad guy. Mom was a nightmare. Brother a goof. Father a knowitall meddler. EL was actually a very smart and pretty funny guy to deal with. I'd vote him into the Hall for his Paul Coffey impression. I'd vote him into the media wing for giving Tim Pannacio a lot of years of material.

YHS, etc
 
taken from HOF site - criteria seems pretty open ended:

HHFM works with members of the Canadian and international hockey community to ensure that those players, builders and officials who have made significant contributions and achievements in the game are honoured and memorialized through their election into Honoured Membership. HHFM also works with the Professional Hockey Writers' Association and NHL Broadcasters' Association to recognize distinguished individuals from the print and broadcast media professions.



One could certainly argue that Lindros made significant contributions to the game.
 
Boom_70 said:
taken from HOF site - criteria seems pretty open ended:

HHFM works with members of the Canadian and international hockey community to ensure that those players, builders and officials who have made significant contributions and achievements in the game are honoured and memorialized through their election into Honoured Membership. HHFM also works with the Professional Hockey Writers' Association and NHL Broadcasters' Association to recognize distinguished individuals from the print and broadcast media professions.



One could certainly argue that Lindros made significant contributions to the game. concussion research.

Fixed.
 
Mr. F,

Good call on Joey Mullen.

I always thought Brett was great on "Be a Player"

"Legion of Doom" is the best name of any line in hockey history.
 
I don't think he'll make the Hall as a player. Instead, he'll make it as a builder, for the contributions he has made to the PA and will continue to make.
 
The vile and evil Bobby Clarke said he belongs in the Hall (I think he must have a concussion!).

Lindros was far from a bust, but he was overhyped. He's no Ryan Leaf.
 
His parents wrecked his career from the get-go. And skating with his head down didn't help his cause.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top