My shop's coverage of a rally calling for a federal immigration law and repealing Arizona's SB 1070 included a paragraph about a community college student holding a sign calling Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer "the next Hitler'' and a quote from the student saying she thought what Brewer is doing in Arizona is similar to what Hitler did in Germany.
I thought there should be an effort to get a response from Brewer, but was over-ruled, with the rationale being that was just "over the top rhetoric" that "says more about the speaker than Brewer."
Was I wrong in the need to seek balance or was the slot man right in just calling it "over the top rhetoric?" To me, what Hitler did in Germany was kill Jews and there is nothing in the Arizona law about starting concentration and death camps.
It could also be said that comparisons with Hitler are often best to be avoided.
I thought there should be an effort to get a response from Brewer, but was over-ruled, with the rationale being that was just "over the top rhetoric" that "says more about the speaker than Brewer."
Was I wrong in the need to seek balance or was the slot man right in just calling it "over the top rhetoric?" To me, what Hitler did in Germany was kill Jews and there is nothing in the Arizona law about starting concentration and death camps.
It could also be said that comparisons with Hitler are often best to be avoided.