Could Deadspin have known Manti Te'o was innocent?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

DrewJo

New Member
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
10
Hello,

This is my first post, and hopefully it's interesting. I've been analyzing how Deadspin covered the whole Manti Te'o/Lennay Kekua story, and something has been bugging me for quite a while...

A big reason Deadspin's article blew up is because they implied, by way of anonymous sources, that Manti Te'o helped perpetrate the dead girlfriend hoax. However, Deadspin also spoke with a woman named Diane O'Meara--the girl whose photos were used to portray Lennay--and they said that Diane told them "everything she knew" about the guy who was really behind the hoax, Ronaiah Tuiasosopo.

Diane spoke on the phone to Ronaiah a few days before Deadspin published their article. Ronaiah confessed that he was behind the hoax, and he likely told her--going by his previous behavior--that Manti was completely innocent. Diane also would've had access to circumstantial evidence which suggested Manti was being duped. Roniah had been hounding Diane with strange requests even into early January, and he had asked for:

A photo of Diane saying, "Good luck No. 5."
A video of Diane saying, "Good luck on the 7th."

Manti Te'o wore number 5 on his uniform, and the BCS title game was on January 7th, so obviously those requests were meant for his sake. I think that any objective reporter would have looked at those facts and realized that Manti and Ronaiah probably weren't in cahoots. Yet Deadspin never mentioned those requests, and they haven't mentioned Diane O'Meara a single time since breaking the story.

Simply put: Does anyone else find that suspicious? Could Deadspin have known a lot more than they were letting on?

Again, any feedback is welcome. I go into a lot more detail over on my blog, but my main points are all in this post.
 
I don't think I remember getting the feeling that Manti Te'o was somehow involved from reading the Deadspin coverage. I'm pretty sure theirs was the only article I read on it.
 
Thank goodness there is a new blog commenting on Manti Teo. We have a desperate shortage of those.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
That whole BCS game was faked. Those players never went to Florida. It was all done on a sound stage in Hollywood. All those early touchdowns? Trick photography. I mean ... c'mon that Golson isn't even on the Notre Dame roster.
 
imjustagirl said:
I don't think I remember getting the feeling that Manti Te'o was somehow involved from reading the Deadspin coverage. I'm pretty sure theirs was the only article I read on it.

Really? Go back and read it again. I like Deadspin well enough, but that was their working theory of the case. And if it wasn't clear at the time, it was certainly clear as the story continued to develop elsewhere - Deadspin mercilessly mocked anybody who remotely suggested that Te'o wasn't in on the deal from the get-go.
 
The suggestion it wouldn't have blown up without implying he was in on it -- which is the premise of the conspiracy that relates to media topic here -- seems silly.

It would've been a big deal either way, just for the car wreck nature of it all.
 
H.L. Mencken said:
The suggestion it wouldn't have blown up without implying he was in on it -- which is the premise of the conspiracy that relates to media topic here -- seems silly.

It would've been a big deal either way, just for the car wreck nature of it all.

I don't think it's outrageous to think Deadspin wanted as juicy a story as possible.

Regardless, we seem to agree that Deadspin implied Te'o was in on the hoax. So I'm just wondering if they had evidence that the implications were wrong.
 
DrewJo said:
H.L. Mencken said:
The suggestion it wouldn't have blown up without implying he was in on it -- which is the premise of the conspiracy that relates to media topic here -- seems silly.

It would've been a big deal either way, just for the car wreck nature of it all.

I don't think it's outrageous to think Deadspin wanted as juicy a story as possible.

Regardless, we seem to agree that Deadspin implied Te'o was in on the hoax. So I'm just wondering if they had evidence that the implications were wrong.

I see only one post that agreed with that.
 
poindexter said:
Didn't Deadspin include an "80% certain" line?

A friend of Ronaiah Tuiasosopo told us he was "80 percent sure" that Manti Te'o was "in on it," and that the two perpetrated Lennay Kekua's death with publicity in mind. According to the friend, there were numerous photos of Ronaiah Tuiasosopo and Te'o together on Tuiasosopo's now-deleted Instagram account.

The sheer quantity of falsehoods about Manti's relationship with Lennay makes that friend, and another relative of Ronaiah's, believe Te'o had to know the truth. Mostly, though, the friend simply couldn't believe that Te'o would be stupid enough—or Ronaiah Tuiasosopo clever enough—to sustain the relationship for nearly a year.

http://deadspin.com/manti-teos-dead-girlfriend-the-most-heartbreaking-an-5976517
 
Everything is fake, faux, and fixed.

It's all a conspiracy. Except the conspirators aren't real-- they're fake.

It's like Inception. Except that movie wasn't real-- it was a dream. A fake dream transplanted into your brain by the conspirators, aka the government.
 
I highly doubt Deadspin would post something they knew to be false. Deadspin is many things, some bad and some good. One thing they do as good as anybody (most times) is investigative journalism.
 
Johnny Dangerously said:
That's a great example of pretty good posting. You still bring it, Lugnuts.

Thank you! I thought of you when I posted that because it's your writing style and your humor. ;)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top