dooley_womack1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2003
- Messages
- 56,488
A different result, and this would have been "Cam Newton: Hall of Famer?"
I think it's strange the troll is confused by trolling. You're the Cam Newton of this board.
I bring more to this board on my lunch break than you've brought in your entire sad life.
All I know about the incentives is how you qualify for them; I don't know what the actual incentives are. You have to publicly declare at least once (more is preferable) you aren't voting in the upcoming presidential election, to show you are totally objective. And your initials have to be DW.Are there thread-starting incentives I don't know about?
I'm pretty confident that **** even voted NO in the title question.
Yes has gotten several PMs praising it for its brave stand.Then who voted yes? The voters should put their name on it and own their votes. No deserved to go in unanimously.
It's worth its own thread.
**** thinks it is worth its own thread. He said so with the OP. So I'm guessing he is one of the Yes votes, unless his non-voting policy extends to message boards.
If only your "lunch breaks" weren't 24 hours.I bring more to this board on my lunch break than you've brought in your entire sad life.
First thing that popped in my head as well.My love for you is like a truck, deserter...
I think it's strange the troll is confused by trolling. You're the Cam Newton of this board.
No deserved to go in unanimously.