BREAKING NEWS: SEVERAL PEOPLE SHOT NEAR EMPIRE STATE BUILDING

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Chef2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2009
Messages
20,558
Still developing. No word on deaths, etc, etc.....
 
per AP.

9:32 AM8/24/2012
NEW YORK (AP) — NYC police: 3 or 4 civilians wounded in shooting near Empire State Building, shooter is dead.
 
CNN

As many as five people were shot Friday in front of the Empire State Building in New York, a spokesman for the New York Fire Department said.

Authorities converged on the building around 9 a.m. after reports of gunfire.

Additional details were not immediately available.
 
One of the networks initially reported it as a "terrorist attack" but that headline was changed very quickly... To be fair, the headline called it that, the story did not.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Mizzougrad96 said:
One of the networks initially reported it as a "terrorist attack" but that headline was changed very quickly... To be fair, the headline called it that, the story did not.

I will never understand why some of the networks glorify that term. Every time someone gets shot, someone is saying that it's a terrorist attack.
 
Hard to tell for sure, but local news has 10 shot, shooter DOA, at least one victim critical. FBI on the scene.
 
Yeah, it's one of those terms where if someone really decided to be a **** about it could say, "Any attack like this is one of terrorism."

It's grossly irresponsible until more information is known.
 
Chef2 said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
One of the networks initially reported it as a "terrorist attack" but that headline was changed very quickly... To be fair, the headline called it that, the story did not.

I will never understand why some of the networks glorify that term. Every time someone gets shot, someone is saying that it's a terrorist attack.

Because people are more likely to stop and watch if the word "terrorist" is in the headline.
 
Armchair_QB said:
Chef2 said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
One of the networks initially reported it as a "terrorist attack" but that headline was changed very quickly... To be fair, the headline called it that, the story did not.

I will never understand why some of the networks glorify that term. Every time someone gets shot, someone is saying that it's a terrorist attack.

Because people are more likely to stop and watch if the word "terrorist" is in the headline.

Very true, but still grossly irresponsible...
 
Post says dispute between co-workers that erupted into gunfire and that a female bystander was also killed.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/manhattan/shot_at_empire_state_building_Ycd08ZMPwDQf7r8qSKX3yO

NBC4 saying disgruntled employee.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
Armchair_QB said:
Chef2 said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
One of the networks initially reported it as a "terrorist attack" but that headline was changed very quickly... To be fair, the headline called it that, the story did not.

I will never understand why some of the networks glorify that term. Every time someone gets shot, someone is saying that it's a terrorist attack.

Because people are more likely to stop and watch if the word "terrorist" is in the headline.

Very true, but still grossly irresponsible...

I don't disagree.

But what passes for TV journalism today has very little to do with ethics or responsibility.
 
Armchair_QB said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
Armchair_QB said:
Chef2 said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
One of the networks initially reported it as a "terrorist attack" but that headline was changed very quickly... To be fair, the headline called it that, the story did not.

I will never understand why some of the networks glorify that term. Every time someone gets shot, someone is saying that it's a terrorist attack.

Because people are more likely to stop and watch if the word "terrorist" is in the headline.

Very true, but still grossly irresponsible...

I don't disagree.

But what passes for TV journalism today has very little to do with ethics or responsibility.

^^^^^
 
From the Daily News. Sounds like killer was targeting a guy, shot him in the head. Then walked out onto the street where police confronted him. Unclear if people were injured by him shooting or caught in the crossfire.

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/person-killed-shooting-empire-state-building-morning-rush-article-1.1143522
 
I am shuddering thinking about this. 5th Ave. and 34th Street is a zoo of people at that time of the morning. It would be impossible to fire a gun without even aiming and not hit someone.
 
Bloomberg press conference coming up. Rumor has it the shooter drank a couple super size cokes.
 
Geez. In front of the Empire State Building at 9 a.m. on a Friday morning? I can't imagine how many people must've been in the vicinity.
 
Armchair_QB said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
Armchair_QB said:
Chef2 said:
Mizzougrad96 said:
One of the networks initially reported it as a "terrorist attack" but that headline was changed very quickly... To be fair, the headline called it that, the story did not.

I will never understand why some of the networks glorify that term. Every time someone gets shot, someone is saying that it's a terrorist attack.

Because people are more likely to stop and watch if the word "terrorist" is in the headline.

Very true, but still grossly irresponsible...

I don't disagree.

But what passes for TV journalism today has very little to do with ethics or responsibility.

And print is not what it used to be either...


A cold-blooded killer was gunned down by police Friday morning after he pumped two bullets into a man outside an entrance to the Empire State Building, cops and witnesses said.

Seven other people were wounded when the gunfire erupted shortly after 9 a.m. on the crowded rush hour sidewalks outside the iconic midtown skyscraper.

The shooting was apparently sparked by a dispute between co-workers at a business located inside the Empire State, sources told the Daily News.

Construction worker Chris Ogden was working on a scaffold above the building’s 33rd St. entrance when he watched in disbelief as the gunman — in a suit and carrying a briefcase — opened fire.

“He shot the guy in the head,” said Ogden, 23. “The guy went down. He took a second shot when he was down.”

The well-dressed shooter then “walked down the block, like nothing was happening, real casual,” Ogden said. “We were screaming from the top, ‘It’s the guy in the grey suit!’”



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/person-killed-shooting-empire-state-building-morning-rush-article-1.1143522#ixzz24TPbPsgh


And if this guy was Asain, Hispanic, Black or anything other than white, it's in the lede. Say that he was white.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top