Bill Conlin update

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

somewriter

Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2003
Messages
323
Hopefully, we each can own a condo like this someday:

http://deadspin.com/sports/old-old-men/its-important-that-you-know-bill-conlins-compensation-326411.php
 
"Know what, pal? Bash this. . .Tell your bloggers, my career against theirs ..."

This line wins the award. You're a sportswriter (so am I, for the record). You're not THAT important, big boy. You certainly wouldn't want to measure the worthiness of your career against the doctors, lawyers, plumbers, pimps who might be blogging on the side.
 
I would think the budget-conscious Philadelphia Media Holdings might not enjoy word of Mr. Conlin's largesse getting out there. Wonder if he's still Guild, as many Philly columnists are apparently (see Smith, Stephen A.).
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
Elliotte Friedman said:
Fenian,

I'm amazed by how Conlin handled this. I mean, it's unbelievable.

It's really *that* amazing?

The guy's a gruff, old columnist who's got **** You money.

I'm surprised he didn't have the blogger killed while he was at it.
 
Every time I see that guy on TV, I keep thinking he's going to go into cardiac arrest right that second, on air. He can barely breathe.
 
Conlin slips when equating bloggers negatively to pamphleteers. Sure, probably most of them were annoying blabbermouths back in the day, but without guys like Thomas Paine we probably never would have had the support to win the Revolutionary War.

Oh, and proving he's hasn't lost his fastball by saying he makes a lot of money is like comparing apples and, uh, well, gold bullion.
 
Ace said:
Conlin slips when equating bloggers negatively to pamphleteers. Sure, probably most of them were annoying blabbermouths back in the day, but without guys like Thomas Paine we probably never would have had the support to win the Revolutionary War.

Oh, and proving he's hasn't lost his fastball by saying he makes a lot of money is like comparing apples and, uh, well, gold bullion.

Ignoring his personality and whether he is a nice person, I didn't read the latter point that way.

If his bosses worked hard to keep him, in part because his columns are still read by the masses, that IS proof he hasn't lost his fastball.

And that is the main point he appeared to be making. The financial angle was piling on, in my opinion.
 
armageddon said:
Ace said:
Conlin slips when equating bloggers negatively to pamphleteers. Sure, probably most of them were annoying blabbermouths back in the day, but without guys like Thomas Paine we probably never would have had the support to win the Revolutionary War.

Oh, and proving he's hasn't lost his fastball by saying he makes a lot of money is like comparing apples and, uh, well, gold bullion.

Ignoring his personality and whether he is a nice person, I didn't read the latter point that way.

If his bosses worked hard to keep him, in part because his columns are still read by the masses, that IS proof he hasn't lost his fastball.

And that is the main point he appeared to be making. The financial angle was piling on, in my opinion.

I disagree.

I don't read him, but just because you are popular doesn't mean you are good. And certainly doesn't mean you are as good as you once were.

And if he wanted to make the point that the bosses wanted him, he could have simply said they kept asking what it would take to keep him instead of throwing money and condos around.

He comes off sounding like a thin-skinned blowhard if you ask me.
 
ballscribe said:
Every time I see that guy on TV, I keep thinking he's going to go into cardiac arrest right that second, on air. He can barely breathe.

I have the same thought. When I saw the title thread, I thought "he finally had the big one."
 
Ace said:
armageddon said:
Ace said:
Conlin slips when equating bloggers negatively to pamphleteers. Sure, probably most of them were annoying blabbermouths back in the day, but without guys like Thomas Paine we probably never would have had the support to win the Revolutionary War.

Oh, and proving he's hasn't lost his fastball by saying he makes a lot of money is like comparing apples and, uh, well, gold bullion.

Ignoring his personality and whether he is a nice person, I didn't read the latter point that way.

If his bosses worked hard to keep him, in part because his columns are still read by the masses, that IS proof he hasn't lost his fastball.

And that is the main point he appeared to be making. The financial angle was piling on, in my opinion.

I disagree.

I don't read him, but just because you are popular doesn't mean you are good. And certainly doesn't mean you are as good as you once were.

And if he wanted to make the point that the bosses wanted him, he could have simply said they kept asking what it would take to keep him instead of throwing money and condos around.

He comes off sounding like a thin-skinned blowhard if you ask me.

Uh ... he is a thin-skinned blowhard.
 
From deadspin:
sharply reduced travel and a mandate to write mostly commentary.

Yep...nothing at all like a blogger there Bill.
 
Not sure I can generalize about the blowhard part, but I have found a surprising and disappointing number of big-time sportswriters to be thin-skinned. Doesn't reflect well on the business when guys like Conlin, Lupica, Albom and a dozen others you probably can think of scream bloody murder or overreact at the first hint of criticism or questioning. Considering all that they dole out.
 
Conlin pulled a huge thorn out of my paw in 1992 at the Albertville Olympics, when I was going it alone, sleeping on floors, etc.

Tossed me the keys to his huge corner suite when he decided to leave a weekend early, said "have fun."

Gets a lifetime pass from me.

I'd still like to grow up to be him, for that matter.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top