Athletic, Axios talking merger?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Poked back in here

Lol, "poked back in here." As if you're not here lurking 24/7 waiting for a chance to humblebrag about having a pro beat or put down anyone who has more Twitter followers than you. Keep on writing columns that get 250 views, old man.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
They've hired people (at least in part) because they have a lot of Twitter followers. But the most important metric at The Athletic is subscriber conversions.
 
They've hired people (at least in part) because they have a lot of Twitter followers. But the most important metric at The Athletic is subscriber conversions.
Meaning the % of those who sign up for the free trial and then ante up for the longer term?
 
Meaning the % of those who sign up for the free trial and then ante up for the longer term?

For the individual writers, it's more about how many non-subscribers click on a story, can't read it, and sign up for a subscription in order to read that. (Our place looks at that too, but it's paramount for a website that claims to be ad-free.)
 
Where did I say don't react on this board? All I said was I've seen a lot of overreactions to this headline. I didn't say the overreactions were all on this board or that people shouldn't post here.

I'm just saying read the article, not just the headline. It doesn't sound like that big of a deal.

Yeah, no big deal. Not like the SEC just put out a buyer beware warning about SPACs or nothing
 
They've hired people (at least in part) because they have a lot of Twitter followers. But the most important metric at The Athletic is subscriber conversions.

They hired a Carolina Hurricanes writer who has a **** ton of followers but 75 percent of her tweets are just insane weirdo crap that has nothing to do with hockey and she thinks she is hilarious
 
For the individual writers, it's more about how many non-subscribers click on a story, can't read it, and sign up for a subscription in order to read that. (Our place looks at that too, but it's paramount for a website that claims to be ad-free.)
Who is the grand leader of journalism who decides what is important any more? Fredrick says this way to judge a writer's value is ridiculous. So some consultant thinks a reader of The Athletic reads the first few paragraphs and says, "By gosh I HAVE to read the rest of this story. Sign me up!" Color me skeptical. It'd be so nice to be a consultant and be able to fool so many suits into $$$$.
 
Who is the grand leader of journalism who decides what is important any more? Fredrick says this way to judge a writer's value is ridiculous. So some consultant thinks a reader of The Athletic reads the first few paragraphs and says, "By gosh I HAVE to read the rest of this story. Sign me up!" Color me skeptical. It'd be so nice to be a consultant and be able to fool so many suits into $$$$.

Yes that’s actually exactly how it works Frederick. Welcome to content marketing in the 21st century.

But no, go ahead and keep writing 2000 word columns about the hot dogs in the Montreal Forum press box. Because CONTENT!
 
If they can't be a high quality publisher then I guess Axios can buy one. LOL
 
They hired a Carolina Hurricanes writer who has a **** ton of followers but 75 percent of her tweets are just insane weirdo crap that has nothing to do with hockey and she thinks she is hilarious

It's sad that you're so bitter about your journalism career that you have to make a fake name called "Sports Barf" so you can go on a message board and insult a woman you've never met just because she found success in her career. There's no shame in not being able to hack it in this industry anymore, and there are better ways to deal with it than spewing sexist bigotry all over a message board.
 
Is this a sports journalism message board or Barstool.com? No wonder this industry has such a diversity problem.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top