Starman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2002
- Messages
- 49,987
As much as I know about UFL player (and coaching) contracts, I believe they are all owned by the league and can be reassigned as they see fit.
Memphis and San Antonio sucked (combined record 3-17) so there's no particular reason to keep those rosters together.
Now Michigan was 6-4, and I suppose it would be an interesting storyline to have the former Michigan franchise move to Columbus and battle into contention for UFL playoff glory, but i doubt they care very much about that.
Common sense says it would be bad for the league to have multiple awful non-competitive franchises stinking up the teevee screens so basically I would guess they'll just reshuffle the deck and cook up three new rosters.
Memphis and San Antonio sucked (combined record 3-17) so there's no particular reason to keep those rosters together.
Now Michigan was 6-4, and I suppose it would be an interesting storyline to have the former Michigan franchise move to Columbus and battle into contention for UFL playoff glory, but i doubt they care very much about that.
Common sense says it would be bad for the league to have multiple awful non-competitive franchises stinking up the teevee screens so basically I would guess they'll just reshuffle the deck and cook up three new rosters.
Last edited: