2019 Running Tennis thread

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

She was the seventh seed. Quick now, what percentage of US sports fans had heard of her before today. She won the French last year. She's a fine player. But sports stories lead with the star and always will.

She has held the No. 1 ranking for 64 weeks, three times longer than Maria Sharapova ever held it and almost six times longer than Venus Williams ever held it.
 
LONDON --- Serena Williams deposited quite a few balls into the net on Saturday.
She did not, however, deposit any down the ****ing throats of any lines people, which perhaps was the bright spot in her otherwise desultory 6-2, 6-2 loss at the hands of Simona Halep in the women's final at Wimbledon.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
I like Federer, and I hope he wins. But there's something oddly endearing about Djoker's gives-no-**** arrogance that makes me respect him. You kind of have to have that in an individual sport.
 
Fed had his chance with two championship points at 9-8 (I think?) ... when he didn't win there, he wasn't winning the match. Incredible cojones from Djoker.
 
So is it a sign of the lack of depth in men's tennis, their own dominance, or just one of those freaky statistical things that the top three on the all-time Grand Slam singles championship list is from this generation of players?
It's amazing to think that Federer is six clear of Sampras' old record and might wind up third all-time by the time he retires.
 
So is it a sign of the lack of depth in men's tennis, their own dominance, or just one of those freaky statistical things that the top three on the all-time Grand Slam singles championship list is from this generation of players?
It's amazing to think that Federer is six clear of Sampras' old record and might wind up third all-time by the time he retires.
It’s modern money, medicine and training. Emerson was in it for 7 years, Laver for 10, Borg 7 years. From the time they won their first to their last. These guys can play longer because they have better opportunities to stay healthy and get healthy.
 
Until the 90s, nobody (other than Australians) wanted to play Australia. Facilities were low-rent, and it was held around Christmas. Then came Flinders Park, a switch to mid-January, and now everyone goes there. That's good for several of the Big 3's major titles.

Connors played it twice, won it (1974) and was runner-up (1975). Skipped it 19 times. Borg played it once.
 
The Big 4 is rapidly dwindling. Murray has retired, Nadal and Federer are hanging on, and that leaves Djoker, who is 32, to be dominant for the next 3 years. Who's the next foil? Wawrinka was a late bloomer and his window has come and gone.
 
Federer looks like hes doing a lot more than hanging on

Murray was very good, certainly, but other than a couple of brief spurts was he ever on the same level as those other three? He always struck me more as an Andy Roddick type -- a contender, a guy who could win some big tournaments and even a few Grand Slams, but never as consistently great as Federer, Nadal and Djokovic.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top