Michael_ Gee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2004
- Messages
- 39,411
Don't get a seat under the second deck. Wear sunscreen instead.
Michael_ Gee said:Don't get a seat under the second deck. Wear sunscreen instead.
rmanfredi said:Let's assume the first two rounds of Group G games go like this:
US def. Ghana
Germany def. Portugal
US draw Ghana
Germany def. Ghana
...would there be any motivation for the US (needing a point to advance) and Germany (needing a point to secure the group) to do anything other than kick the ball around the midfield for 90 minutes and exchange jerseys at the end? To me, that's the most realistic "good" scenario for the US, and one that would make me giggle a bit since it would send Sepp Blatter into conniptions.
da man said:rmanfredi said:Let's assume the first two rounds of Group G games go like this:
US def. Ghana
Germany def. Portugal
US draw Ghana
Germany def. Ghana
...would there be any motivation for the US (needing a point to advance) and Germany (needing a point to secure the group) to do anything other than kick the ball around the midfield for 90 minutes and exchange jerseys at the end? To me, that's the most realistic "good" scenario for the US, and one that would make me giggle a bit since it would send Sepp Blatter into conniptions.
Good draw for the U.S., getting to play Ghana twice.
poindexter said:da man said:rmanfredi said:Let's assume the first two rounds of Group G games go like this:
US def. Ghana
Germany def. Portugal
US draw Ghana
Germany def. Ghana
...would there be any motivation for the US (needing a point to advance) and Germany (needing a point to secure the group) to do anything other than kick the ball around the midfield for 90 minutes and exchange jerseys at the end? To me, that's the most realistic "good" scenario for the US, and one that would make me giggle a bit since it would send Sepp Blatter into conniptions.
Good draw for the U.S., getting to play Ghana twice.
Ghana played three out of the first four games. They are going to be tired.
kingcreole said:A few European powerhouses have **** the bed in recent World Cups.
Italy in 2010.
France in 2002 and 2010.
Spain in 1998.
Portugal in 2002.
Maybe this is Germany's year to **** the bed. Or not. Can't hurt to be wishful.
Football_Bat said:kingcreole said:A few European powerhouses have **** the bed in recent World Cups.
Italy in 2010.
France in 2002 and 2010.
Spain in 1998.
Portugal in 2002.
Maybe this is Germany's year to **** the bed. Or not. Can't hurt to be wishful.
England just about every year except in 1966, when it hosted and won, and 1990, when it placed third.
deskslave said:Football_Bat said:kingcreole said:A few European powerhouses have **** the bed in recent World Cups.
Italy in 2010.
France in 2002 and 2010.
Spain in 1998.
Portugal in 2002.
Maybe this is Germany's year to **** the bed. Or not. Can't hurt to be wishful.
England just about every year except in 1966, when it hosted and won, and 1990, when it placed third.
Fourth, actually. And 74, 78 and 94, when they didn't qualify.
Of course, that relies on accepting the premise that England is a European powerhouse.
cjericho said:deskslave said:Football_Bat said:kingcreole said:A few European powerhouses have **** the bed in recent World Cups.
Italy in 2010.
France in 2002 and 2010.
Spain in 1998.
Portugal in 2002.
Maybe this is Germany's year to **** the bed. Or not. Can't hurt to be wishful.
England just about every year except in 1966, when it hosted and won, and 1990, when it placed third.
Fourth, actually. And 74, 78 and 94, when they didn't qualify.
Of course, that relies on accepting the premise that England is a European powerhouse.
Definitely don't think they're a European powerhouse, but does 86 count as them ****ting the bed when they lose on a hand ball goal to the eventual champs.
deskslave said:cjericho said:deskslave said:Football_Bat said:kingcreole said:A few European powerhouses have **** the bed in recent World Cups.
Italy in 2010.
France in 2002 and 2010.
Spain in 1998.
Portugal in 2002.
Maybe this is Germany's year to **** the bed. Or not. Can't hurt to be wishful.
England just about every year except in 1966, when it hosted and won, and 1990, when it placed third.
Fourth, actually. And 74, 78 and 94, when they didn't qualify.
Of course, that relies on accepting the premise that England is a European powerhouse.
Definitely don't think they're a European powerhouse, but does 86 count as them ****ting the bed when they lose on a hand ball goal to the eventual champs.
For all England's failures at the highest levels, it's worth noting the relatively thin margins between them and possibly winning in both 86 and 90. Although 86 was before I knew anything about the World Cup, everything I've seen suggests that that quarterfinal matched two of the best, if not the two best, teams in that World Cup. And in 90, they were every bit the equal of West Germany and indeed hit the (inside of the) post in extra time. If they do win that game, they almost certainly beat a depleted Argentina in the final.
And of course, if that shot goes in, England don't lose on penalties, the shootout curse at least doesn't begin then and who knows what happens. (Of course you can go a long way with that -- they also qualify for 94 automatically, as the defending champ did in those days, so Graham Taylor doesn't get sacked for failing to qualify.)