A very private, intimate ceremony

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

YankeeFan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2004
Messages
55,078
With 200 guests, and a 27-person bridal party!

http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20120603/NEWS/306020060?nclick_check=1

How the hell do you describe this as a "low-key ceremony"?
 
imjustagirl said:
Journalism topic ... how?

Because Gannett described a 200 person wedding, with a 27-person bridal party, as "intimate" and "low key".

Stupid.
 
Inky_Wretch said:
Low-key has nothing to do with the size of the crowd. And 200 is not large at all, we had double that at our wedding.

I had originally written "is 200 really that many?" But I didn't want to invite YF's wrath. So thank you for saying it.
 
Inky_Wretch said:
Low-key has nothing to do with the size of the crowd. And 200 is not large at all, we had double that at our wedding.

200 isn't huge, but it's also not small.

A 27-person bridal party? That's big -- especially for a 30-year-old and a 45-year-old. You usually see big wedding parties with younger couples.

This was a full blown, Church wedding, with a big white dress, and 200 guests. So, is it "low key" because the President didn't attend?

I don't understand. What was intimate about it?

Show, don't tell, right? Gannett told me it was intimate. Nothing they showed indicated the same.
 
Point of Order said:
Neither private nor intimate connotes size.

Private = not public. I haven't really bitched about that.

But, intimate and low-key? Does anything in the article indicate either of those?
 
Did you see the church? Do you know how large it is? Did you see how ornate the decorations were? You can have 200 people in the seats and 13 people next to each of you, but if it's the two of you, a bouquet, two officiants and a small church, that's intimate and low-key.
 
It would have been appropriate for Biden, as host, to invite several hundred Senators, staffers, foreign dignitaries, Delaware pols, and assorted spouses.

Or his daughter could have a wedding where the guests were all family and friends.

YF, I can see where you find that incomprehensible.
 
Ok, I'll say it: Ashley Biden is hot. I expect 21 and Lugs to give her mad props for those toned arms any minute now. ]
 
waterytart said:
It would have been appropriate for Biden, as host, to invite several hundred Senators, staffers, foreign dignitaries, Delaware pols, and assorted spouses.

Or his daughter could have a wedding where the guests were all family and friends.

YF, I can see where you find that incomprehensible.

I'm not sure the absence of 1,000 guests, and 100's of dignitaries means this wedding was intimate or low key.

Could it have been bigger? Sure.

But, have you ever attended a Church wedding with 200 guests, a 27-person bridal party, and a Vera Wang designed dress, and described it as intimate and/or low key?
 
Seems like you're making assumptions of what the ceremony was, instead of actually finding out what it was.
 
1) 200 people is not a large wedding. For people with money, it's probably quite a bit on the small side.

2) Daughter of hifalutin dignitary ... Delaware ... anyone do any motor-boating?

2005_the_wedding_crashers_005.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
YF: I'm FROM Delaware. Me, my two brothers and my two nieces all had Delaware society weddings (not all located in Delaware, mine was the big room at St. Pat's). And yes, those two adjectives might be appropriate.
 
I found this to be an odd passage in the story:

"It’s not so uncommon for politicians in high places to see their daughters marry into families of Jewish descent, when you consider former Vice President Al Gore’s daughter Karenna and Andrew Schiff, and Chelsea Clinton and Philadelphia’s Marc Mezvinksy."
 

Latest posts

Back
Top