Moderator1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2002
- Messages
- 32,791
Herman could sue Smith certainly, but Smith doesn’t own a pot to **** in, so what’s the point. Plus, it opens Herman up to discovery, which for a major college coach is never good.Could Twitter not be sued for this? Defamation?
Wow. Why don't I think this will ever be mentioned on ESPN?
So to be clear, if you ran the news desk at ESPN, your decision would be to amplify the potentially libelous allegations of a man who:
1. Clearly abused alcohol on a regular basis
2. Is accused of physically abusing his wife repeatedly for a decade.
3. Is clearly emotionally unstable.
4. Was fired from his job when these issues came to light.
This is your news judgment?
I imagine Herman’s guilty of about 82% of the allegations. Call me cynical. He just seems like the type. Not every coach does. Mark Dantonio, for example, seems more likely to read a very long, very dry biography than visit a massage parlor.
One that’s written in a coffee shop.
So to be clear, if you ran the news desk at ESPN, your decision would be to amplify the potentially libelous allegations of a man who:
1. Clearly abused alcohol on a regular basis
2. Is accused of physically abusing his wife repeatedly for a decade.
3. Is clearly emotionally unstable.
4. Was fired from his job when these issues came to light.
This is your news judgment?