Your Note-Taking System

[CR19]

I'm sure this thread has popped up before, but I want to see if anyone has changed the way they've done it. When you're covering a game, doing an interview, preparing for a game, etc., how do you take notes? Do you use different notebooks for different things, keep the same? Is there any specific formats you use? What advice would you give someone on taking notes? Any advice is appreciated.

 

[BobSacamano]

I've been wanting to make this topic for a while, so I guess now's a good a time as any to ask: Am I the only asshole who doesn't take notes with a pen and pad?

My audio recorder does the job for me with interviews and my BlackBerry handles the rest when it's question time. Normally, I let the player know that I'm not being rude and checking text messages, but referring to notes in my digital memopad. They appreciate that.

I tried doing the hand-written notes thing at first, but felt like I was losing too much of the interview while trying to keep it conversational. It also helps to have a fantastic memory and strong understanding of any tangents the interview may drift toward.

 

[mustangj17]

I use one notebook until I fill it. Only use voice recorders rarely, as backup. Usually for gamers on deadline just to see if there is anything I didn't catch the in the notebook. Otherwise, if I have a gap, I'll call for a followup question or two.

 

[Greg Pickel]

It really depends on the situation for me. Sometimes I'll only use a recorder, sometimes I'll only use pen and paper, and sometimes I'll use the recorded and then jot down parts of the interview I want to go back and either ask for clarity on, or listen to specifically in the piece I'm writing.

Doing prep for a game, I use a score sheet that has categories that most statisticians would use, plus any categories I consider relevant or would like to keep. If I'm going to a prep game, I'll also go online to the metro that keeps the stats and what not and jot down some information on both teams unless I already have it.

Hope this helps.

 

[WBarnhouse]

1. Rely on memory.
2. Look over other reporters' shoulders at their notes, laptops.
3. If those fail, make it up.

 

[EagleMorph]

Rely heavily on recorder because I can't read my own writing, nor can I write fast enough to keep up in my own shorthand. I have a notepad with me that I'll use for other purposes.

Also found a recorder tends to help create more conversational interviews, especially in one-on-one post-game situations. Frees up another hand to use however - write notes about follow-up questions, detail a reaction, etc.

During the game, the notebook is a sort of repository for any information I may need post-game. Stats, observations, streaks, etc. Also used post-game to reflect back on things and jog my memory.

 

[writingump]

I'll use a voice recorder most of the time because it does help conduct better interviews, plus I write so slowly that I tend to lose too much in translation. If I'm covering a night game with a tight deadline, I'll go with a notebook so I can write quotes and not have to go searching for the quote on the voice recorder. Thankfully, I do have a good memory so I can go that route and know that I'll be accurate. And to answer Bob's question, I've covered games with others who go the Blackberry route as well.

 

[schiezainc]

I use a legit notepad (Not a reporter's pad) that is regular high-school like size. All of my coworkers think I'm strange but it's nice because I'll have all of my notes, for every game I go to, for an entire season which proved VERY helpful.

As for what notes I take, I do play by play on my notebook, use the margins to highlight things I want to talk about later and use my recorder to do interviews afterward.

Question I have for everyone: What do you do with interview tapes? Do you transcribe them or do you just listen to them and input quotes while you're writing. I know it takes a while but I like to transcribe everything, mainly because it allows me to really think about what the person said and a lot of times I notice things I didn't on the first take.

 

[esport12]

Really interesting topic. I think it depends on the story and the situation: gamer, feature, prep, pro, etc.

I like voice recorders because they pick up everything. But I think they can also be a hindrance. Some people see that as intimidating, and all of the sudden they become less candid. It's an interview not a conversation.

I also like to have a notepad because I can write down things that aren't said: sights, sounds, scene, reaction, etc.

 

[playthrough]

I don't know if voice recorders are quite as intimidating today. Sit down for a chat with someone and chances are there will be a phone or Blackberry on the desk, either yours or the other guy's, and some of those can record too so it's much more subtle. Not like a years ago when you'd plop a giant tape player on the table (and even microcassette players look big now).

I'm way too addicted to my recorder; I'm jealous of people who can take great shorthand. I'm sure I've spent an entire year of my life transcribing.

 

[JackReacher]

Gamers = pen and pad
Features and other non-gamers = recorder.

The worst is when someone comes in from his or her game 30 minutes before deadline, then spends 25 minutes transcribing his notes from the recorder. Never a good thing.

 

[copperpot]

Other than when I first started out in the biz some 15 years ago, I've never used a recorder. I like to use steno pads. I've heard too many stories (probably rarer nowadays) of people who didn't take notes and then accidentally erased their tapes, found their recorder wasn't working, etc.

Beyond that, for me, taking notes by hand is kind of a built-in editor. When someone gives me a gem of a quote, I write it word for word; beyond that, I do basic notes. I think that's helped me not dump my notebook in most of my stories and not rely completely on quotes. Since I do a lot of editing these days, I can usually tell when a reporter has used a recorder -- long, drawn-out quotes -- and when they haven't, although that's not so much a condemnation of recorders as it is a reflection that reporters need to use better judgment on what all belongs in a story.

 

[murphyc]

I second what mustang said. I sometimes have trouble reading my chicken scratch writing, but on the other hand listening and re-listening to the recorder on deadline takes a while, and I sometimes notice I'm so focused on transcribing I loose track of what is really important for the story.
When I was early in my career, a competing shop's SE covered the same game I did. We were interviewing a football coach after a game. I glance over between questions and notice random squiggly looking lines on said SE's yellow legal pad. Others told me later the SE could look at his lines and know exactly what the quote was. In essence, he had a photographic memory and used notes as his back-up system. I wish my mind worked like that.

 

[JackReacher]

Can't remember ever accidentially erasing anything from my recorder or found it not to be working. Simple: check to make sure everything's in working order BEFORE you use it.

But digital recorders are SCARY!!!! Just ask one of my former bosses, who still uses a cassette recorder.

 

[highlander]

1. Rely on memory.
2. Look over other reporters' shoulders at their notes, laptops.
3. If those fail, make it up.

Do you write all your stories in the crayon color of the team you are covering?

 

[UPChip]

I prefer to use a legal pad on a clipboard. I've gotten used to holding the clipboard in the crook of my left elbow while I take photos, and I'm a big believer that it's good to have on hand for protection in case of light rain or a stray foul ball headed for the head/junk.

 

[FleetFeet]

I've never used just a recorder. Always been too afraid that I'd be one or two pushed buttons away from a lost interview. Don't like that risk.

On both features and post-game interviews, I've hit "record" with the machine and take notes also. I agree, though, that the more you rely on the recorder, the more conversational an interview can be (and the more comfortable the interview subject).

What kills me is, I spent that time doing the interview ... then in the car on the laptop or in the office, have to go through the whole interview again. Waste of time ... so while I have a digital version of it, generally I just use my handwritten notes and be done with it.

 

[DennisReynolds]

If I'm writing a feature or something I'll have a while to work on, I tend to stick with just a recorder, then go back and transcribe the whole thing. It's too difficult to keep up with note taking for a long conversation, and I've found that if you're just using the recorder, it's much easier to actually listen to what the person is saying, process it and be able to ask intelligent follow up questions.

If I'm doing something like a gamer on deadline, I still use my recorder but also will take some notes (like UPChip, I go legal pad on clipboard). I don't try to write down everything but mostly jot down the gist of what is said so that as I write, I can look to see what kinds of quotes I have and where in the interview I can find them on the recorder.

 

[flexmaster33]

I gave up on recorders real quick in college...quickly grew tired of doing an interview, then listening to said interview in slow motion.

I use a reporters notebook and for gamers, I have one side with a table for basic stat taking and I use the flip side of the paper for noting big plays, etc.

I've been telling myself for years that I should have one notebook for basketball and another for wrestling, etc, but have yet to do it. This next school year, that plan will go in place...too much time flipping pages looking for the right game

My editor and former sports editor always uses a large yellow legal pad because her handwriting is big...I prefer the smaller reporters notebook since it's easier to tote around.

 

[JackReacher]

Why do you listen to your interviews in slow motion?