Why WWE coverage?

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

JR119

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2004
Messages
33
It really is embarrassing how sports websites and sports newspaper sections cover entertainment wrestling.

But they all want their clicks. It belongs in the entertainment sections not sports.

Today's (Thursday's) news is about a famous female wrastler's death, BUT Doris Roberts died, too, and she played a mother of a famous sports writer. No coverage of that:(

Sell outs!!!
 
I agree. It would never appear in our sports section. It's news, but not sports. No.
 
Do sports sections still cover the Westminster Dog Show? If they do, they can still cover pro wrestling, too.

On a serious note, you want to put content where the most interested eyeballs will see it.

For pro wrestling news, that's the sports section. That's where I'd look first.
 
Like it or not, pro wrestling is entertainment, and the wrestlers are athletes, so it really can go in either section.

The matches, of course, shouldn't be covered as an actual sport, but the behind the scenes stuff, and learning about the wrestlers' lives out of the ring are legitimate stories, just like any other TV or movie.
 
I'm not sure I've ever seen a wrestling story in a print newspaper......Web sites like SI or ESPN stick it on their Pages 2s or Extra Mustards or Grantland or whatever their "other" section is called....not sure where else it would go.
 
I'm not sure I've ever seen a wrestling story in a print newspaper......Web sites like SI or ESPN stick it on their Pages 2s or Extra Mustards or Grantland or whatever their "other" section is called....not sure where else it would go.

When I was a kid, the Philadelphia Inquirer ran the results of WWF Spectrum shows on the agate page.
 
When I was a kid, the Philadelphia Inquirer ran the results of WWF Spectrum shows on the agate page.

I can't remember which NY tab (Daily News or the Post) used to run results from MSG, the Nassau Coliseum, the Meadowlands and, for a few years, Monday Night Raw.
 
Do sports sections still cover the Westminster Dog Show? If they do, they can still cover pro wrestling, too.

On a serious note, you want to put content where the most interested eyeballs will see it.

For pro wrestling news, that's the sports section. That's where I'd look first.
We always put the dog show in the A section as well.

I'm not sure I've ever seen a wrestling story in a print newspaper......Web sites like SI or ESPN stick it on their Pages 2s or Extra Mustards or Grantland or whatever their "other" section is called....not sure where else it would go.
You clearly have never seen my paper. :) We have features on a pretty regular basis. But I'm sure we are an exception.
 
I should say I haven't seen one lately and never the kind of JR is on about. I saw a feature on John Cena once....it was about his being in town for a fundraiser for his brother, an injured cop if I remember, but it was before he was a main eventer. I think the Boston Herald had a photo of Tyson from a Wrestlemania hype thing on their back page back in 1997.
 
It really is embarrassing how sports websites and sports newspaper sections cover entertainment wrestling.

But they all want their clicks. It belongs in the entertainment sections not sports.

Today's (Thursday's) news is about a famous female wrastler's death, BUT Doris Roberts died, too, and she played a mother of a famous sports writer. No coverage of that:(

Sell outs!!!

Had a hard time hearing you over all that harumphing.
Agree that it should go in the entertainment section, but there's also no harm in putting it in sports if you think it's worth putting in the paper to begin with and that's where more people will see it.
The days of being virtuous when it comes to this stuff are long gone.
 
Trying to figure out how Doris Roberts' death could be spinned to the sports page.
 
Do sports sections still cover the Westminster Dog Show? If they do, they can still cover pro wrestling, too.

We've had to run it if news doesn't want to run it, which is odd to have one day's story in the A section and then the next day's story in Sports, but that's our paper for you.
 
Heaven forbid, but if Brock Lesnar dies in the next three years, where do you put his obit?

What about Kurt Angle? Or Bill Goldberg? Or Ron Simmons? Or Ken Shamrock? Or Mark Henry?

A lot of these guys were prominent athletes in "real" sports before they became pro wrestlers.
 
Heaven forbid, but if Brock Lesnar dies in the next three years, where do you put his obit?

What about Kurt Angle? Or Bill Goldberg? Or Ron Simmons? Or Ken Shamrock? Or Mark Henry?

A lot of these guys were prominent athletes in "real" sports before they became pro wrestlers.
Sorry, but none of these guys merits much more than a brief or a short obit inside.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top