Whitlock's latest feud: Len Pasquarelli

Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

Mizzougrad96

Active Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2002
Messages
56,139
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/02/10/hall-of-fame-voter-len-pasquarelli-rips-idiots-like-jason-whitlock/#content

Pasquarelli calls Whitlock an idiot for ripping the HOF voters for putting Richard Dent in over Willie Roaf.
 
Fued and personal feelings aside, Whitlock has a point. Both Priest Holmes and Larry Johnson were monsters because they ran behind Roaf (and Will Shields) early and often. And that's to say nothing of what Roaf accomplished in New Orleans.
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
doubledown68 said:
Fued and personal feelings aside, Whitlock has a point. Both Priest Holmes and Larry Johnson were monsters because they ran behind Roaf (and Will Shields) early and often. And that's to say nothing of what Roaf accomplished in New Orleans.

Roaf gets in before Shields but both will get in.
 
Oh, I agree with Whitlock in this argument.

And while I have my own issues with Whitlock because of things he's done here, I'll take him over Pasquarelli in a heartbeat.
 
PFT mocked Pasquarelli for years. Whitlock is the site's new golden boy. He's already been on a few podcasts and they feverishly stroke the pole each time his column comes out.
 
“I think there probably will be a day where there’s more transparency,” Pasquarelli said. “I believe in transparency to a point, but I do think that having TV cameras in that room and televising the whole thing, while it would make for fascinating theater, you’re absolutely right about that, would perhaps deter some people from airing their views, and probably bring even more criticism.”

The media, which demands transperacy from everyone and everything, hates when it is asked to be transparent.
 
TheSportsPredictor said:
“I think there probably will be a day where there’s more transparency,” Pasquarelli said. “I believe in transparency to a point, but I do think that having TV cameras in that room and televising the whole thing, while it would make for fascinating theater, you’re absolutely right about that, would perhaps deter some people from airing their views, and probably bring even more criticism.”

The media, which demands transperacy from everyone and everything, hates when it is asked to be transparent.

That was crushed.
 
BYH said:
TheSportsPredictor said:
“I think there probably will be a day where there’s more transparency,” Pasquarelli said. “I believe in transparency to a point, but I do think that having TV cameras in that room and televising the whole thing, while it would make for fascinating theater, you’re absolutely right about that, would perhaps deter some people from airing their views, and probably bring even more criticism.”

The media, which demands transperacy from everyone and everything, hates when it is asked to be transparent.

That was crushed.

As well it should...
 
TheSportsPredictor said:
“I think there probably will be a day where there’s more transparency,” Pasquarelli said. “I believe in transparency to a point, but I do think that having TV cameras in that room and televising the whole thing, while it would make for fascinating theater, you’re absolutely right about that, would perhaps deter some people from airing their views, and probably bring even more criticism.”

The media, which demands transperacy from everyone and everything, hates when it is asked to be transparent.

Yeah, very well-said.

The stories I've heard about the **** that goes on in that room is disgraceful.

A former co-worker would tell me stories that would blow your mind and said everything people hate about sports journalists can be seen in that room.

Homerism, back-room deals, 20-year grudges... They need to be held accountable.
 
I miss Dr Z's reports from the room. He always provided great insight to what happened.

If not for Dr Z Tagliabue would be in the Hall.
 
Boom_70 said:
I miss Dr Z's reports from the room. He always provided great insight to what happened.

If not for Dr Z Tagliabue would be in the Hall.

The lack of accountability in that room is a bigger problem than anyone knows. This latest class is hardly a controversial one. If Dent vs. Roaf is the biggest outrage, I'd say you're doing pretty well compared to most years.

There was one year where my friend told me that they didn't want to vote in a certain player but knew they'd be hammered if they didn't. This was a guy who was going to get in eventually anyway.

There was another year where one voter was so against one of the finalists that he started reading a book when another writer was presenting for said player.
 
i agree 1,000 percent that the method used for the pro football hof selections is an antiquated system long overdue for revision. it's time for it to be opened up to a much' larger voting population; sadly, many people in that room have agendas and their vote carries waaay more weight than it should when the voting body is so small.

i am always astounded at the animous len p. generates on SportsJournalists.com. the guy has long been among the hardest working football reporters i've known, one with a much more fair-minded outlook than most.

the fact that there are folks here who admit that their support automatically goes to jason in a feud with len p. boggles my mind.

i i mean no disrespect to those who share that sentiment; just sayin' i'm blown away that it exists.
 
On my beat, Pasquarelli was the most despised writer in the country and that was a belief that was held initially by the older writers and then eventually shared by the younger writers when he did to one of them (not me) what he had done to one of the older writers.
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
On my beat, Pasquarelli was the most despised writer in the country and that was a belief that was held initially by the older writers and then eventually shared by the younger writers when he did to one of them (not me) what he had done to one of the older writers.

Because he torched people?
 
Mizzougrad96 said:
TheSportsPredictor said:
“I think there probably will be a day where there’s more transparency,” Pasquarelli said. “I believe in transparency to a point, but I do think that having TV cameras in that room and televising the whole thing, while it would make for fascinating theater, you’re absolutely right about that, would perhaps deter some people from airing their views, and probably bring even more criticism.”

The media, which demands transperacy from everyone and everything, hates when it is asked to be transparent.

Yeah, very well-said.

The stories I've heard about the **** that goes on in that room is disgraceful.

A former co-worker would tell me stories that would blow your mind and said everything people hate about sports journalists can be seen in that room.

Homerism, back-room deals, 20-year grudges... They need to be held accountable.

They should put it on NFL Network, C-SPAN-like.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top