Whitlock canonizes Favre

  • Thread starter Thread starter Derek_W
  • Start date Start date
Sports Journalists Forum – Media, Newsroom & Reporting Talk

Help Support Sports Journalists Forum:

D

Derek_W

Guest
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/10325372/It's-the-Truth:-Favre's-proving-Thompson-wrong

I'm a huge Vikings and Favre fan, but even I'm surprised at how far Jason goes in his praise of Favre.

Thoughts?
 
"What Favre has done so far this season is the stuff of legends. It surpasses Ruth's "called shot" in the 1932 World Series and Joe Namath's Super Bowl guarantee. I'd put Favre's 2009 performance on par with the "Miracle on Ice" and Ali's "Rumble in the Jungle" victory."

744871-brett-favre-minnesota-vikings.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Typical Whitlock. Favre is the most polarizing figure in professional sports right now. And taking his side, especially like this, will rile people up. I doubt he believes what he's writing, but that's not the point.
 
If Favre was playing behind the Packer OL this year, he would be dead.
 
Well more than half of their wins have come against the Rams, Browns, Lions and a team that has allowed 31 sacks.

Yes, a majestic achievement.
 
nothing like waiting until the season's over. how'd brett and the jets finish the 2008 season? does whitlock review movies where he leaves halfway through?
 
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change.
You completely missed the point of the article. Whitlock does everything but pee on Ted Thompson's front lawn in insulting the guy. It's less about canonizing Favre than pointing out an idiot runs the Packers.
 
Thompson made the right move. As someone pointed out, Favre would be getting killed behind that offensive line. More importantly, had they kept Favre around, Rodgers would likely have walked at some point, and then the franchise would truly be ****ed.
 
YGBFKM said:
Thompson made the right move. As someone pointed out, Favre would be getting killed behind that offensive line. More importantly, had they kept Favre around, Rodgers would likely have walked at some point, and then the franchise would truly be ****ed.

Whitlock's argument is that Thompson could have used the pick that gained them Rodgers on a different player. He could have traded for Randy Moss. There were many things that could have been done to improve the team around Favre from the day Thompson signed up.
 
Whitlock is so ****ed in the head.

I'm no Ted Thompson Kool-Aid drinker, but Favre would be doing far worse and making far dumber decisions than Aaron Rodgers is at the moment and would be a bigger ***** about it too. The Packers would be much worse off for it.

Thompson is an arrogant hard-to-love figure, but he ain't a moron because Diva Favre only wanted to be in Green Bay on Favre's terms.

As for the column, bunnies don't get much browner.
 
TheSportsPredictor said:
YGBFKM said:
Thompson made the right move. As someone pointed out, Favre would be getting killed behind that offensive line. More importantly, had they kept Favre around, Rodgers would likely have walked at some point, and then the franchise would truly be ****ed.

Whitlock's argument is that Thompson could have used the pick that gained them Rodgers on a different player. He could have traded for Randy Moss. There were many things that could have been done to improve the team around Favre from the day Thompson signed up.

The Randy Moss meme (you know I'm pissed if I use the word "meme") is one of the most ridiculous there is surrounding Favre.

Yes, the Patriots went 16-0 that season. The Packers went 13-3, and instead of Favre zeroing in on one receiver to the point of ridiculousness, which he would have done had Moss been there, he got to spread the ball around to Donald Driver, Greg Jennings, James Jones and Donald Lee.

Not getting Moss presumes the Packers' receiving corps sucked. It was one of the deepest in the league in '07. Favre's bitching about Moss was diva-ish to the nth degree.
 
TheSportsPredictor said:
YGBFKM said:
Thompson made the right move. As someone pointed out, Favre would be getting killed behind that offensive line. More importantly, had they kept Favre around, Rodgers would likely have walked at some point, and then the franchise would truly be ****ed.

Whitlock's argument is that Thompson could have used the pick that gained them Rodgers on a different player. He could have traded for Randy Moss. There were many things that could have been done to improve the team around Favre from the day Thompson signed up.

I would respond to this, but I don't want to pile on to what Bubbler is doing to you.
 
TheSportsPredictor said:
You completely missed the point of the article. Whitlock does everything but pee on Ted Thompson's front lawn in insulting the guy. It's less about canonizing Favre than pointing out an idiot runs the Packers.

What about this paragraph?

"What Favre has done so far this season is the stuff of legends. It surpasses Ruth's "called shot" in the 1932 World Series and Joe Namath's Super Bowl guarantee. I'd put Favre's 2009 performance on par with the "Miracle on Ice" and Ali's "Rumble in the Jungle" victory."

Well more than half of their wins have come against the Rams, Browns, Lions and a team that has allowed 31 sacks.

Yes, a majestic achievement.

But they also almost knocked off Pittsburgh. In fact, that's a game the Vikings should have — and would have — won, if it weren't for a ridiculous tripping penalty that erased a Favre TD pass and a second screen pass bouncing off the hands of Chester Taylor in the final minute.
 
Once again, for the bazillionth time, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!

Make He Who Shall Not Be Named go away! PLEASE!

I want my Vikings back.
 
Rosie said:
Once again, for the bazillionth time, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!

Make He Who Shall Not Be Named go away! PLEASE!

I want my Vikings back.

Right after He helps the Vikes win the Super Bowl. Give it a few months, then you can have them back. :)
 

Latest posts

Back
Top