It made me laugh, too.That was a stupid thing to do. But God help me, the Cheap Trick line made me laugh.
According to the N&O, he got the press pass by saying he works for College Insider, which says he hasn't worked for them in years. Story is getting even crazier:
Banned sportswriter shouldn’t even have had Duke credentials, College Insider says
"Attaching a photo of her and her friends without their permission?" Since when do you need permission to post a photo of somebody in public?
I'm surprised Duke's athletics deptartment didn't vet this guy before issuing a credential. Most places I've been around do, to avoid fanboys taking up space on press row.This is what's wrong with today's media. Fanboys gaining access to press row. It happens all over. I'm surprised **** like this doesn't happen more often.
I'm surprised Duke's athletics deptartment didn't get this get before issuing a credential. Most places I've been around do, to avoid fanboys taking up space on press row.
"Attaching a photo of her and her friends without their permission?" Since when do you need permission to post a photo of somebody in public?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/***/technology/2016/09/16/privacy_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqNJjoeBT78QIaYdkJdEY4CnGTJFJS74MYhNY6w3GNbO8.png?imwidth=1400
Someone once tried to get a credential to a rock concert using my name and publication. The person issuing the credential didn't just push every request through -- she actually did her homework, thought it was odd that a sports reporter would need a credential and called me at my office to confirm.
I thought it was particularly odd because you typically need photo identification when you pick your credential up. I'm not sure how that was going to work, and the guy never showed up to find out.