Flying Headbutt
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2002
- Messages
- 18,515
Started this while reading something from Dan Kennedy from the Boston Phoenix.
http://medianation.blogspot.com/2008/01/mitt-romney-and-truth.html
I wonder, why don't we ever say someone has out and out lied when we know for a fact they have? Clearly, it would go beyond just when a source gets something wrong or whatever. But when we know someone currently is, or has previously lied to us, why don't we just come out and say that's what happened? Especially since we'd have the truth as a defense?
http://medianation.blogspot.com/2008/01/mitt-romney-and-truth.html
I wonder, why don't we ever say someone has out and out lied when we know for a fact they have? Clearly, it would go beyond just when a source gets something wrong or whatever. But when we know someone currently is, or has previously lied to us, why don't we just come out and say that's what happened? Especially since we'd have the truth as a defense?